Skip to main content
Public Asset Utilization Media

Site menu

PUBLIC AS A COMMON GOOD

Public asset utilization,
starting from the thinking.

Operated by the Institute for Social Vision Design (ISVD) ↗Sister media: KOSO 0 ↗Privacy Policy日本語で読む

ARTICLE · Park-PFI

Beppu City Harukigawa Park — Park-PFI in a Hot Spring City and the Design Behind ¥14 Million in Annual Usage Fees

Beppu City's Harukigawa Park is a landmark Park-PFI case as western Japan's first three-dimensional urban park. By stacking commercial facilities on the first floor and park functions on the second, the operator's proposal projects approximately ¥14 million a year in usage fees and related payments to the city. This article examines the design behind that figure.

The points of this article

  • Beppu City's Harukigawa Park is western Japan's first three-dimensional urban park, featuring SuperCenter Trial on the first floor and an artificial turf ground, café, and studio on the second
  • The operator's proposal projects approximately ¥14 million a year in usage fees and related payments to the city — the figure Beppu's selection committee assessed in December 2021. Construction costs are borne by the private sector
  • Presented at the PPP/PFI Promotion Mayors' Conference as a 'Triple-Win Public-Private Partnership,' it is gaining national attention as a model for hot spring city park activation
Who this is for, and what to know first

Who this is for

  • Municipal officials in hot spring or tourism cities considering park activation
  • Private operators and designers interested in three-dimensional urban park design
  • PPP/PFI researchers seeking to understand Park-PFI revenue structures

What to know first

  • Basic understanding of Park-PFI ([Complete Guide to Park-PFI](/en/park-pfi-guide))
In this article

Overview of Harukigawa Park

Full picture of western Japan's first three-dimensional urban park. The long-standing challenge of undeveloped land and Park-PFI as the solution

Usage fees and related payments to the city (operator's projection)

¥14M

Assessed by the selection committee, December 2021

Park site area

9,238㎡

Full opening

Dec 2024

Western Japan's first 3D urban park

Beppu City's Harukigawa Park is the first urban park in western Japan to utilize the three-dimensional urban park system. For park land that had remained undeveloped for years despite urban planning designation, the introduction of (Public Recruitment Installation and Management System) enabled park development using private-sector funding and expertise.

The three parties in Park-PFI: the manager approves and permits, the operator builds and runs and pays a fee, the user pays for services.
Check the development-cost contribution and payment conditions in the published guidelinesSource: MLIT City Bureau, Guidelines on Using Park-PFI (May 2025 revision), §2.2

This case merits attention for three reasons.

First, the "three-dimensionalization" approach — placing a park on a building's rooftop — achieves both commercial and park functions on limited land. Second, the project is operated by an SPC (Special Purpose Company) led by local enterprises, demonstrating a regional city Park-PFI model that does not depend on major consulting firms. Third, the operator's proposal projects approximately ¥14 million a year in usage fees and related payments to the city, a design that turns the park from a "cost" into a "revenue source."

On December 7, 2024, the western area of Harukigawa Park opened fully, with the artificial turf ground, rehabilitation exercise facility, learning facilities, café, and other amenities entering service.


Three-Dimensional Design

Technical background and Urban Park Act positioning of the first-floor commercial / second-floor park stacked structure

First Floor: Commercial Facility (SuperCenter Trial)

The first floor of Harukigawa Park houses SuperCenter Trial as the anchor tenant.

Of the 9,238㎡ site, approximately 6,000㎡ has been developed as a three-dimensional structure with commercial facilities on the first floor. SuperCenter Trial is a discount store handling daily necessities and groceries, serving the everyday shopping needs of Beppu residents.

Second Floor: Park Functions (Harukigawa Park)

The building's rooftop (second floor) has been developed as the park. The main facility components include:

  • All-weather artificial turf ground: Accommodates sports such as soccer and futsal
  • Rehabilitation exercise facility: Exercise facilities supporting elderly health promotion
  • Multi-purpose studio: Accommodates indoor activities such as dance and yoga
  • Learning facility: Space for children's educational support and community activities
  • Café and retail shop: Dining and retail for park users
  • Management office and changing rooms: Core operational infrastructure

Why "Three-Dimensionalization" Was Chosen

Harukigawa Park's site area of approximately 9,238㎡ is not particularly large. To simultaneously secure revenue through commercial facilities and meet residents' sports and health needs within this limited area, the three-dimensional approach was adopted. In a flat layout, a trade-off would emerge — "adding commercial functions shrinks the park" or "expanding the park eliminates revenue facilities" — but three-dimensionalization resolves this dilemma.


Business Scheme and Revenue Structure

SPC composition, construction cost allocation, and what makes up the projected ¥14 million a year

Unit costs and amounts in financial examples without a cited source are illustrative assumptions, not statistically established market rates. Use estimates and comparable records appropriate to the target facility, location and business when preparing a project plan. Distinguish these assumptions from cited statistics and case expenditure.

SPC (Special Purpose Company) Composition

Development and operation of Harukigawa Park is handled by the SPC "Minerva Inc.," composed of four companies centered on local enterprises.

The composition set out in Beppu City's selection result and assessment is as follows.

As recorded in the primary sourceEntity
RepresentativeGoto System Service Co., Ltd.
MemberMinerva Sports Club (general incorporated association)
MemberAoki Shoji Co., Ltd.
MemberNishi Shoten Co., Ltd.

Beppu City's record gives neither the locations of these companies nor how roles are divided between them. We were able to confirm two things.

  • The representative, Goto System Service, is headquartered in Minamitateishi, Beppu City (company website)
  • Minerva Sports Club has its office in Shiomi-cho, Beppu City, on the second floor of Harukigawa Park (its own site)

The SPC itself, Minerva Inc., is also registered in Shiomi-cho, Beppu City. The representative is a Beppu company and the SPC is registered in Beppu — a different shape from a project led by a major developer. Counting how many of the four are local, however, would require confirming the remaining two locations against a primary source, which we have not done as of 30 August 2026.

Structure of Annual Usage Fee Revenue

The figure comes from Beppu City's own record. The selection committee's assessment states that "in the price assessment, the committee valued the projection that usage fees and related payments to Beppu City would come to approximately ¥14 million a year under the plan."

This is the operator's projected figure, not what the city actually received. The selection took place in December 2021 and the west area opened in December 2024, so the assessment predates opening by three years. We have found no published record of the amount the city actually received (as of 2026-08-29).

Key aspects of this revenue structure include:

① Private-sector construction cost burden: Construction costs for both the park (second floor) and commercial facility (first floor) are borne by the SPC, significantly reducing the city's initial investment.

② How the usage fees are built: What is charged for what is set out in Beppu City's solicitation guidelines.

Charged forAmount
Installation permit fee for solicited park facilities (commercial, etc.)Operator's proposed unit price × permitted area. Minimum ¥1,440/m² per year
Land use fee for the three-dimensional urban park portionRent derived from an appraised land value (appraisal cost borne by the operator)
Occupancy permit fee for convenience facilitiesSignage ¥33/day per m² of display area; bicycle parking ¥120/month per m²
Installation permit fee for designated park facilities (paths, plazas, restrooms)Waived once the city confirms they are not operated for profit
Profit sharingWhen after-tax profit exceeds 120% of plan, part of the excess returns to the city (method agreed with the city)

If any part tracks sales, it is the profit sharing — and that applies only above 120% of plan. The fee itself is a unit price multiplied by an area.

③ Maintenance cost reduction: The SPC also handles day-to-day park maintenance, reducing the city's maintenance expenditure. The city benefits fiscally from both usage fee revenue and maintenance cost reduction.


Locational Conditions as a Hot Spring Tourism City

Beppu City's demographic trends, tourist numbers, and park user needs analysis

Characteristics of Beppu City

Beppu City is a hot spring tourism city with a population of approximately 110,000 (as of 2024) and annual tourist numbers exceeding 8 million. Known for its "Beppu Hatto" (eight hot spring areas), it ranks among Japan's premier hot spring destinations.

These locational conditions affect Park-PFI in two directions.

Positive impact: Tourist-driven visitor draw

Hot spring tourists may use park facilities and the café. The café and retail shops on Harukigawa Park's second floor have high affinity with the behavioral pattern of "strolling around the hot spring area → stopping at a café for a break."

Negative impact: Seasonal fluctuation in tourism demand

Beppu City's tourist numbers fluctuate seasonally, peaking during the summer beach season and winter hot spring season, with park users declining during off-peak periods. SuperCenter Trial (first floor) serves as a buffer against this seasonal volatility through its steady everyday demand.

Beppu City's Other Park-PFI Deployments

Beppu City has also applied Park-PFI to the Beppu Park East Parking Lot Convenience Facilities Project, making it a "multi-park deployment" municipality implementing Park-PFI across multiple parks. The success of Harukigawa Park appears to have accelerated Park-PFI deployment at other parks within the city.


Evaluation as a National Model

Content of the PPP/PFI Promotion Mayors' Conference presentation and implications for other municipalities

Presentation at the PPP/PFI Promotion Mayors' Conference

At the PPP/PFI Promotion Mayors' Conference held on November 11, 2024, Beppu City Mayor Yasuhiro Nagano presented the Harukigawa Park case as a "Triple-Win Public-Private Partnership."

The "triple win" refers to the following three beneficiaries:

BeneficiaryBenefit
City (government)Usage fees and related payments of about ¥14 million a year (operator's projection), private-sector construction cost burden, maintenance cost reduction
Operator (SPC)Commercial facility revenue opportunity, long-term stable business secured
ResidentsAccess to sports and health facilities, daily shopping convenience, café and relaxation space

Prior Market Sounding Survey

Before introducing Park-PFI, Beppu City conducted a market sounding survey to ascertain private-sector participation appetite and business viability conditions in advance. Through this survey, the "three-dimensionalization" concept was formed and reflected in solicitation conditions.

The careful execution of a led to appropriate operator selection and a viable business scheme — a procedural lesson for other municipalities.

Implications for Other Municipalities

The Harukigawa Park case is particularly relevant for municipalities with the following conditions:

  • Undeveloped park land: Urban-planning designated land left undeveloped for years exists in many municipalities nationwide
  • Regional core cities with populations around 100,000: Lacking the visitor draw of major cities but having sufficient everyday commercial demand
  • Tourism resources: Hot springs, nature, historical assets, and other tourism resources can boost park visitor numbers
  • Capacity for locally-led SPC formation: Availability of local enterprises that can complete the business within the region without reliance on major firms

→ For guidance on conducting Park-PFI market sounding surveys, see Park-PFI Market Sounding.


Fundamentals

Complete Guide to Park-PFI

Comprehensive explanation of the Public Recruitment Installation and Management System: mechanism, procedures, and cases

Park-PFI Usage Fee Design

Usage fee revenue calculation methods, national benchmarks, and design considerations

Park-PFI Latest Cases and Statistics [2026 Edition]

Nationwide statistics across 203 parks and policy trends

What to do next

When using a case to inform a project, check how its conditions differ from the target park.

#What to check or considerResponsible team or contact
1Compare the case with the target park's area, location and users. Do not assess viability from population size alonePublished records and target park surveys
2Obtain the case municipality's solicitation guidelines and selection results. Ask the responsible team for records not published onlineParks team in the case municipality
3Compare the minimum fee in the guidelines with the fee in the selected proposalSolicitation guidelines and selection results
4Check existing building footprints and building coverage limits in the target park's local ordinanceParks team
5Present the target park's conditions and the case evidence, and ask operators about their interest and requirementsMarket sounding

To apply a case to the target park, examine the solicitation terms and selected proposal. Identify which conditions are relevant, accounting for differences in area, location and users.

This coverage-ratio uplift is not 10 percentage points for rest facilities and another 10 for solicited park facilities: the two share a single 10%. In a park that has already reached 12% with rest or sports facilities, no new amenity facility can be added as a solicited park facility. Both that 10% and the ordinary 2% are figures the law asks local governments to take into account, and the ratio that applies is the one each local government sets in its own ordinance.


References

Harukigawa Park Project — Selection Result and Assessment — Beppu City Harukigawa Park Project Operator Selection Committee (2021)

Harukigawa Park Project — Solicitation Guidelines — Beppu City (2021)

Harukigawa Park Development and Operation Project — Beppu City (2024)

PPP/PFI Promotion Mayors' Conference: Beppu Mayor's Presentation — Triple-Win Public-Private Partnership — Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2024)

Harukigawa Park Opening — Beppu City's Three-Dimensional Park with Trial and Other Tenants — Urban Commercial Research Institute (2023)

Harukigawa Park Development Project: Designated Developer Decision — Beppu City (2022)

Statistics cited in this article

  1. 1Beppu City Harukigawa Park Project Operator Selection Committee, Selection Result and Assessment(December 2021) Open source
  2. 2Urban Commercial Research Institute(2023) Open source
  3. 3Beppu City Harukigawa Park Development Project(2024) Open source
  4. 4Beppu City Designated Developer Decision(2022) Open source
  5. 5MLIT PPP/PFI Promotion Mayors' Conference(November 2024) Open source
  6. 6MLIT City Bureau, Guidelines for Park-PFI to Improve the Quality of Urban Parks (revised May 2025, in Japanese), 2.3(2025) Open source

Share or cite this article

When quoting an article in internal reports, council proceedings, study sessions or research, include the article title, PUBLIC 0 (Institute for Social Vision Design) and its URL.

What was corrected

  1. — The location and role columns for the SPC member companies were not in Beppu City's records. The claim that three of four are local rested on the same columns, so we rewrote the passage to what we could confirm.

    Before
    A three-column table of company, location and role (Goto System Service = Beppu City, SPC representative; Minerva Sports Club = Beppu City, sports operation; Aoki Shoji = Miyazaki Prefecture, commercial operation; Nishi Shoten = Beppu City, local procurement). Notably, three of the four companies are Beppu-based local enterprises
    After
    The table now shows only what the primary source records: representative or member, and the entity name. Locations are given for two entities only — Goto System Service (Minamitateishi, Beppu City) and Minerva Sports Club (Shiomi-cho, Beppu City) — each sourced to the entity's own website, with a note that the remaining two are unconfirmed

    Reason Beppu City's Selection Result and Assessment and its Proposal Summary give neither locations nor a division of roles among the member companies. Matching company names against commercial databases is not reliable enough, since identically named entities exist. We did confirm from its own site that the SPC, Minerva Inc., is registered in Shiomi-cho, Beppu City.

  2. — We replaced the source for the approx. ¥14 million in annual usage fees. The MLIT document does not contain that figure.

    Before
    Source: MLIT PPP/PFI Promotion Mayors' Conference, Beppu Mayor's presentation (November 2024)
    After
    Source: Japan Park Facilities Association small-scale case seminar (July 2024), with a note in the body that the MLIT deck does not carry the figure

    Reason We extracted all 18 pages of that deck and also inspected the four pages covering Harukigawa Park as images. The figure does not appear. The only monetary figure in the deck is the annual balance for Beppu Park, a different park. Verification of the figure itself is still in progress.

  3. — The ¥14 million a year is the operator's projected figure, not revenue the city secures. We replaced the source with Beppu City's own record and rewrote the passages.

    Before
    Beppu City is reported to secure approximately ¥14 million in annual usage fee revenue through the Park-PFI model (source: Japan Park Facilities Association small-scale case seminar)
    After
    The operator's proposal projects approximately ¥14 million a year in usage fees and related payments to the city (source: Beppu City Harukigawa Park Project Operator Selection Committee, Selection Result and Assessment, December 2021), with a note that we could not find any published record of the amount actually received

    Reason The committee's assessment states that in the price assessment it valued the projection that payments to the city would come to about ¥14 million a year under the plan. The selection was in December 2021 and the west area opened in December 2024, so the assessment predates opening by three years. We also replaced a passage that speculated the fee combined a sales-linked variable component with a fixed component; the actual calculation is set out in Beppu City's solicitation guidelines (installation permit fee with a minimum of ¥1,440/m² per year, rent derived from an appraised land value for the three-dimensional portion, and profit sharing only above 120% of plan).

Key Terms in This Article

Park-PFI
A system under Japan's Urban Parks Act that publicly solicits private operators to develop and manage revenue-generating facilities (e.g., cafés) alongside park facilities. Established by 2017 law revision with up to 20-year permits.
Sounding (Market Survey)
A dialogue-based market survey conducted before public tender to gather private sector opinions and ideas on utilizing public assets. Used to pre-validate feasibility and appropriate conditions.

What to check on your own case

  • Does your municipality have long-undeveloped park land? Could a three-dimensional approach unlock its potential?
  • Could a locally-led SPC like Harukigawa Park's model be assembled in your municipality?
  • How does a projected ¥14 million a year in usage fees compare to your municipality's park maintenance costs?

YOUR PROJECT

From the general to your own case.

For your building and your tender terms, you can ask us about studies, policy groundwork, dialogue and proposal preparation. The first conversation covers where things stand and what we can cover; work on your case is quoted in advance.

Contents

Essential site functions are always enabled. You can change optional cookie preferences here at any time.

Learn more ↗

Search articles

Type what you want to find. Separate several words with spaces.

Search article titles, summaries and full text.

Primary sourcesGlossaryFAQ