Skip to main content
Public Asset Utilization Media

Site menu

PUBLIC AS A COMMON GOOD

Public asset utilization,
starting from the thinking.

Operated by the Institute for Social Vision Design (ISVD) ↗Sister media: KOSO 0 ↗Privacy Policy日本語で読む

ARTICLE · Abandoned School Reuse

Closed School Reuse Trends in 2026: The MEXT Survey Breakdown, Why Uses Stay Undecided, Hearing from Residents, and National Programs

MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024), read alongside the previous survey: 8,850 closed schools, the use counts behind the 5,661 in use among the 7,612 still standing, the breakdown of the 1,951 not in use and why their uses stay undecided, and how residents were consulted. Added are the FY2025 School Basic Survey, three studies on community participation, and the 2026 surplus classroom survey, small concession guidebook and formation project.

The points of this article

  • As of 1 May 2024, 8,850 schools had closed between FY2004 and FY2023. Of the 7,612 whose buildings still stand, 5,661 (74.4%) are in use and 1,951 (25.6%) are not. The previous survey (as of 1 May 2021, covering closures from FY2002 to FY2020) counted 8,580, 7,398 and 5,481 (74.1%).
  • Of the 1,951 not in use, 1,503 have no decided use. For school buildings, the leading reasons (multiple answers) are no requests from the community at 41.5% and an aged building at 41.4%. For 49.6% of school buildings, residents had not been asked for their views.
  • MEXT's surplus classroom survey, published on 10 April 2026, says no further rounds will be conducted unless circumstances change. The small concession guidebook issued in May 2026 includes a closed elementary school in Komatsu, Ishikawa, and two of the nine FY2026 studies under the formation project cover schools.
Who this is for, and what to know first

Who this is for

  • Board of education staff, public asset divisions, and migration officers in municipalities considering closed school reuse
  • PPP/PFI promotion divisions drafting a Comprehensive Public Facility Management Plan
  • Private operators and regional coordinators considering participation in closed-school Small Concession schemes

What to know first

  • Basic understanding of Public Facility Operating Rights and Small Concession schemes (see [our article on MLIT's small concession guidebook](/en/small-concession-mlit-guide-2026))
  • Familiarity with the overview of Comprehensive Public Facility Management Plans
In this article

What the MEXT Survey Shows

Scope and reference date of the survey, the counts from 8,850 closed schools down to the 5,661 in use, how to compare with the previous survey, and the Minna no Haiko Project

Schools closed between FY2004 and FY2023

8,850 schools

The previous survey (FY2002 to FY2020) counted 8,580

Closed schools whose buildings still stand

7,612 schools

Excluding the 1,238 with no remaining facility

Share of those still standing that are in use

74.4%

5,661 schools. The previous survey found 74.1%

Schools among the 1,951 not in use that have no decided use

1,503 schools

19.7% of those still standing

MEXT tracks the number and use of closed schools in its Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities. It covers public elementary, junior high, compulsory education, high, secondary and special needs schools nationwide, and asks about the number of closed schools, how they are used, and the status of review toward use. Results as of 1 May 2024 were published on 31 March 2025, and the previous survey was as of 1 May 2021.

ItemThis survey (as of 1 May 2024)Previous survey (as of 1 May 2021)
Closure years coveredFY2004 to FY2023FY2002 to FY2020
Closed schools8,8508,580
Buildings still standing7,612 (86.0%)7,398 (86.2%)
In use5,661 (74.4%)5,481 (74.1%)
Not in use1,951 (25.6%)1,917 (25.9%)
No remaining facility1,238 (14.0%)1,182 (13.8%)

The figures come from Appendix 3 on the use of closed school facilities. Shares for buildings still standing and for no remaining facility are of all closed schools; shares for in use and not in use are of buildings still standing.

The two surveys cover closure years two years apart. This survey drops the schools that closed in FY2002 and FY2003 and adds the 1,025 that closed from FY2021 to FY2023, after the previous survey. The differences between the two cannot be read directly as increases or decreases.

The stock of closed schools: 8,850 cumulative, 7,612 still standing, 5,661 in use (74.4%), 1,951 unused of which 1,503 have no decided use.
The number needing attention is 1,503 — neither the 8,850 total nor the 1,951 unusedSource: MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)

In September 2010 MEXT launched the Minna no Haiko Project (Everyone's Closed School Project), which gathers and publishes information on closed school facilities nationwide that are looking for new uses, holds events to promote reuse, and introduces reuse cases.


How Fast Schools Are Closing

Closures by year, school and enrolment counts in the FY2025 School Basic Survey, projected population at school ages, and MEXT's consolidation pamphlet

Closures by Year

Dividing 8,850 schools by the 20-year period gives an average of about 442 a year. That roughly matches the Minna no Haiko Project page, which says about 450 school facilities close nationwide each year, but it is a 20-year average and recent years fall below it. Read year by year, the same survey shows 279 to 405 closures a year since FY2016, never reaching 450, and 384, 345, 369, 358 and 298 for FY2019 through FY2023. Use the year-by-year figures when setting a baseline for a business plan.

Schools and Children

As of 1 May 2025, there were 18,291 public elementary schools, 215 fewer than the year before, and 8,982 public junior high schools, 51 fewer, while public compulsory education schools rose by 22 to 254. Enrolment across national, public and private schools was 5,812,375 at elementary level, down 129,358, and 3,105,297 at junior high level, down 35,835, both record lows.

In the five-year age brackets of the Institute's result tables, adding the 5-9 and 10-14 brackets gives 9.68 million in 2025 and 7.19 million in 2050. That is roughly 26 percent fewer over 25 years. These are the ages that fill elementary and junior high schools.

In March 2025 MEXT issued a pamphlet, To Those Considering the Consolidation of Public Elementary and Junior High Schools, based on its 2015 guidebook on the appropriate size and placement of public elementary and junior high schools. Among examples of problems that often arise with consolidation and ways to handle them, it lists passing on the school's role as a local hub, and includes the use of closed school facilities under that heading.


What Closed Schools Are Used For

Use counts by category, tallied separately for school buildings and gymnasiums as multiple responses (10,348 in total), with the previous survey counts

The survey counts the uses of closed schools that are in use. It tallies school buildings and gymnasiums separately, with multiple responses, so the counts add up to 10,348, more than the 5,661 schools in use. Shares are of those 10,348 counts, not of schools.

UseCount (share)School buildingsGymnasiumsPrevious survey (share)
Schools (excluding universities)4,191 (40.5%)2,1102,0813,948 (39.1%)
Social sports facilities1,693 (16.4%)1551,5381,756 (17.4%)
Social education and cultural facilities1,206 (11.7%)7504561,330 (13.2%)
Welfare and medical facilities, etc.735 (7.1%)533202774 (7.7%)
Corporate facilities and start-up support facilities1,207 (11.7%)7894181,020 (10.1%)
Government offices, etc.449 (4.3%)323126461 (4.6%)
Hands-on and exchange facilities, etc.535 (5.2%)349186520 (5.1%)
Emergency stockpile warehouses231 (2.2%)15873199 (2.0%)
Universities81 (0.8%)473479 (0.8%)
Housing20 (0.2%)13721 (0.2%)

The largest category, schools excluding universities at 4,191, splits almost evenly between 2,110 school buildings and 2,081 gymnasiums. Of the 1,693 social sports facilities, 1,538 are gymnasiums. Compared with the previous survey, corporate facilities and start-up support facilities went from 1,020 to 1,207, and social education and cultural facilities from 1,330 to 1,206. As noted above, the two surveys cover different closure years. The survey does not break schools excluding universities down any further, so the table cannot tell whether a building became the merged school or a different kind of school.


The 1,951 Schools Not in Use

Use decided, not decided and scheduled for demolition; the closure years of those with no decided use; the eight reasons uses stay undecided

Three Groups

The 1,951 schools not in use divide into 235 whose use has been decided, 1,503 whose use has not, and 213 scheduled for demolition.

GroupThis surveyPrevious survey
Use decided235 (3.1%)278 (3.8%)
Use not decided1,503 (19.7%)1,424 (19.2%)
Scheduled for demolition213 (2.8%)215 (2.9%)

Shares are of closed schools whose buildings still stand (7,612 in this survey, 7,398 in the previous one).

Closure Years of the Schools with No Decided Use

By the year they closed, the 1,503 schools with no decided use peak at 129 for FY2023, followed by 118 for FY2022. FY2004 accounts for 66 and FY2013 for 75, and adding FY2004 through FY2013 gives 605.

Why Uses Stay Undecided

The reasons are multiple responses, tallied separately for school buildings (n=2,177) and gymnasiums (n=1,994).

Reason (multiple answers)School buildings (n=2,177)Gymnasiums (n=1,994)
No requests from the community or others903 (41.5%)795 (39.9%)
The building has aged902 (41.4%)749 (37.6%)
Funding cannot be secured327 (15.0%)275 (13.8%)
Poor location387 (17.8%)299 (15.0%)
Legal restrictions depending on the use126 (5.8%)104 (5.2%)
Unsure how to use it137 (6.3%)100 (5.0%)
No review of use has been carried out189 (8.7%)217 (10.9%)
Other615 (28.2%)550 (27.6%)

For school buildings, no requests from the community and an aged building sit one response apart, and other reasons account for 28.2%. Which of the two applies changes the next step. If no one has asked for the building, start by looking for someone to lease and use it, for example through . If the building has aged, get the seismic assessment and a renovation cost estimate first, and compare them with demolition.

Hearing from Residents and What Research Shows

How residents were asked for their views, the guidebook advice on doing so, and the abstracts of Funase et al. (2021), Ota et al. (2024) and Davis et al. (2023)

Asking Residents for Their Views

The survey also asks whether local residents were asked for their views on using the closed school. For 49.6% of school buildings (n=7,211) and 53.9% of gymnasiums (n=7,144), they had not been.

How views were sought (multiple answers)School buildings (n=7,211)Gymnasiums (n=7,144)
Questionnaire survey479 (6.6%)413 (5.8%)
Hearings at briefings and similar2,782 (38.6%)2,500 (35.0%)
Other739 (10.2%)717 (10.0%)
Not done3,580 (49.6%)3,850 (53.9%)

The small concession guidebook issued in May 2026 lists questionnaires, hearings, workshops and briefings as ways to get residents' views, and suggests choosing by purpose: hearings or workshops to pull together the views of a small group, questionnaires to hear from many people, and briefings to build understanding of the project. It warns that agreeing a specific direction with the community can make other uses hard if that function proves unviable as a business, and suggests offering several functions as options or agreeing on a broader image, such as a function that draws visitors.

Three Studies

Funase et al. (2021) is a research report in the proceedings of the City Planning Institute of Japan's Kansai Branch. According to its abstract, it drew the features of community participation from 76 excellent cases of closed school reuse nationwide, then traced the process from review to operation in four excellent cases in Hyogo Prefecture. About half of the national cases involved community participation. The study found it effective for the community to form an organization and review options together with the municipality, to use workshops and social experiments on a base of consensus-building in meetings, and to bring in experts and young people for flexible thinking.

Ota et al. (2024) analyses TSUKU-RASSERU, a community hub in a closed school in the mountainous part of Toyota City, using published materials and observation. Its abstract reports three findings: continuous relationships among local entities have created diverse activities, the hub plays the role of a catalyst for new activities, and most connections among the entities come from activities in the free-use spaces on the ground floor.

Davis et al. (2023) starts from the more than 650 public schools that closed in Puerto Rico between 2007 and 2019, and categorizes and maps 161 repurposed schools, 38 of which were "rescued schools" repurposed through grassroots, voluntary initiatives. Drawing on twelve interviews and two focus groups, it describes the challenges of gaining school ownership and attracting sustained financial and volunteer support, and argues that government authorities can reduce the harm of closures by forging new partnerships among community-based organizations, municipal governments and other supportive actors.


National Moves in 2026

Results and future of the surplus classroom survey, the closed-school case in the small concession guidebook, and two school studies in the formation project

The Surplus Classroom Survey Will Not Be Repeated

A surplus classroom is one not currently used as a regular classroom that, given the child population living in the school district, is not expected to be used as a regular classroom within the next five years (by the end of FY2030). The FY2025 survey, published on 10 April 2026, counted 74,138 surplus classrooms in public elementary and junior high schools, 891 more than the 73,247 of the previous survey in 2021. Of these, 72,902 (about 98.3%) were in use: 69,468 as facilities of the same school, 3,094 as non-school facilities such as after-school children's clubs, and 340 as facilities of other schools such as special needs schools. The same document says repeated surveys have shown that surplus classrooms are being used nationwide and continuously, that the survey has largely served its purpose, and that no further rounds will be conducted unless circumstances change. It says nothing about the future of the closed school survey.

A Closed School in the Guidebook

are described in the guidebook issued by MLIT and the Cabinet Office in May 2026 as efforts in which local governments work with private operators to use idle public facilities they own, such as closed schools and vacant houses, to solve local issues and raise the value of the area, with project costs in principle under about ¥1 billion.

Case 2 in the guidebook is a former elementary school in Komatsu City, Ishikawa, which closed in March 2018. Its building had been made earthquake-resistant in a major renovation in 2011. The city chose a self-financing designated manager arrangement that pays no management fee, and ordered the renovation work separately so as not to raise the bar for local firms to take part. Because of restrictions tied to subsidies used in past renovations, it drew up a regional revitalization plan and used a scheme that waives repayment to the national treasury. The project runs for about ten years, from March 2021 to March 2031. Public costs were about ¥560 million for renovation work and up to ¥31 million for design, and the subsidy used was the Comprehensive Support Program for Vacant House Measures (¥265 million). The building houses lodging, a restaurant and rental space.

Two School Studies in the Formation Project

MLIT's Small Concession Formation Promotion Project sends experts to local governments that plan to use idle public facilities such as closed schools and old houses, to help solve problems at the early stage of a project. Nine studies are under way in FY2026. Two of them cover schools: a study on reusing a former elementary school with a community hub function in Iwata City, Shizuoka, and a study on reusing a former high school by Yamaguchi Prefecture with Ube City.

Latest Trends and Statistics in Abandoned School Revitalization【2026 Edition】

Uses whose counts changed between MEXT's two surveys, plus national measures and subsidy programs

MLIT's Small Concession Guidebook Explained — Three Walls, VFM Exemption, and Contract Risks [May 2026 Release]

The guidebook's three walls, four cases, steps and simplified procedures, and support programs

Transforming Idle Public Real Estate from Liability to Asset — A Municipal Strategy Guide [2026 Edition]

The state of idle public real estate, options for use, subsidies and support, failure patterns, and steps from inventory to solicitation

What to do next

In the order you can act on them, within the week you read this.

#What to doWhereRough effort
1Find at least one occupant first. Decide who takes the space, then decide the useMarket sounding, local operators1–3 months
2Produce the seismic assessment and asbestos survey. Commission them if they do not existYour facilities team2–3 months
3Get a renovation cost estimate based on step 2, and price demolition alongside itA design officeOne month
4Check the property disposal procedure. Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)Board of education, MEXT1–2 months
5Hold a briefing with alumni and community groups before announcing the useAlumni association, neighbourhood associationOne month

Skip step 1 and you end up with a decided use and no one to take it.


References

Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2025)

Minna no Haiko Project — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2026)

Results of the FY2025 Survey on the Utilization of Surplus Classrooms (as of 1 May 2025) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2026)

Publication of the FY2025 School Basic Survey — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2025)

To Those Considering the Consolidation of Public Elementary and Junior High Schools — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2025)

Population Projections for Japan: 2023 Estimate, result tables — National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (2023)

Research on the process of community participation in excellent case of closed school’s utilization — Yuzuki Funase, Kaoru Matsuo, Shigeaki Takeda, Hiroyuki Kaga (2021). Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch, Vol. 19, pp. 65–68

THE ROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COMMUNITY HUB REUSING THE CLOSED SCHOOL IN THE MOUNTAINOUS AREA BY DIVERSE ENTITIES -Case study of “TSUKU-RASSERU” in Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan- — Masaya Ota, Yan Li, Hisashi Komatsu (2024). Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 89, No. 822, pp. 1414–1425

Puerto Rico’s Rescued Schools: A Grassroots Adaptive Reuse Movement for Abandoned School Buildings — Davis, John-Michael; Reyes, Mariana; Abrogar, Jacob; Bourgoin, Jocelyn; Brown, Madison; Kellum, Evelyn; Polito, Francis; Jiusto, Scott (2023). Social Sciences 12(12), 662

廃校施設、活用74% 交流施設や特産物の工場に転用も (Closed school facilities: 74% in use, some turned into exchange facilities and factories for local products) — 教育新聞 (2025)

スモールコンセッションのすすめ~遊休公的施設の利活用のための手引き~ (Recommending Small Concessions: A Guidebook for Utilizing Idle Public Facilities) — Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism; Cabinet Office (2026)

Small Concession Formation Promotion Project — Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2026)

Statistics cited in this article

  1. 1MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024) Open source
  2. 2MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  3. 3MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, Appendix 3 (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  4. 4MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, Appendix 1 (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  5. 5MEXT, Publication of the FY2025 School Basic Survey (26 December 2025, final figures)(2025) Open source
  6. 6MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, Appendix 3, main uses (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  7. 7MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, reference material on closed schools with no decided use(2025) Open source
  8. 8MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, reference material on reasons uses are not decided(2025) Open source
  9. 9MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, reference material on hearing residents(2025) Open source
  10. 10MLIT and Cabinet Office, Recommending Small Concessions: A Guidebook for Utilizing Idle Public Facilities (May 2026, in Japanese), STEP 1-3(2026) Open source
  11. 11MEXT, Results of the FY2025 Survey on the Utilization of Surplus Classrooms (as of 1 May 2025)(2026) Open source
  12. 12MLIT and Cabinet Office, Recommending Small Concessions: A Guidebook for Utilizing Idle Public Facilities (May 2026, in Japanese)(2026) Open source
  13. 13MLIT and Cabinet Office, Recommending Small Concessions: A Guidebook for Utilizing Idle Public Facilities (May 2026, in Japanese), Case 2(2026) Open source
  14. 14MLIT, Small Concession Formation Promotion Project(retrieved 14 September 2026) Open source

Share or cite this article

When quoting an article in internal reports, council proceedings, study sessions or research, include the article title, PUBLIC 0 (Institute for Social Vision Design) and its URL. Quotation and reuse guidance →

Corrections

  1. — We said MEXT had surveyed the use of closed schools every year since 2002, and called a results PDF a general portal.

    Before
    Since 2002, MEXT has conducted the Survey on Abandoned School Facility Utilization as an annual exercise (linked in the references as MEXT's general portal for its annual survey)
    After
    MEXT tracks the number and use of closed schools in its Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities; the previous survey was as of 1 May 2021

    Why we got it wrong The FY2024 results PDF gives 1 May 2021 as the date of the previous survey, so the survey is not conducted every year. The link we described as a general portal was the FY2024 results PDF itself.

  2. — We said the surplus classroom survey was published at the same time as the closed school survey, but it came out more than a year later, and one classroom figure combined two of the survey's categories.

    Before
    the concurrently published Survey on Surplus Classroom Utilization FY2025 / internal school use: 69,468; external facility use: 3,434 / largely absorbed into the extension of school functions (small-group instruction rooms, special needs classrooms, etc.)
    After
    The FY2025 survey, published on 10 April 2026, found 72,902 surplus classrooms in use: 69,468 as facilities of the same school, 3,094 as non-school facilities and 340 as facilities of other schools

    Why we got it wrong The closed school survey was published on 31 March 2025 and the surplus classroom survey on 10 April 2026. The 3,434 was the sum of the 3,094 classrooms used as non-school facilities and the 340 used as facilities of other schools, a grouping the survey does not use. Uses within the same school are listed as spaces for diverse learning and teaching methods (33,849), special classrooms (12,590) and so on, not as small-group instruction rooms and special needs classrooms.

  3. — The comparison of public school numbers with 1989 and the claim that MEXT revised its consolidation guidebook for the first time in 2025 were not in the sources.

    Before
    the number of public elementary and junior high schools has decreased by 7,647 schools (21.7%) compared to 1989 / MEXT revised its School Consolidation Guidebook for the first time in 2025, newly stipulating that municipalities with only one elementary and one junior high school should consult with neighboring municipalities for consolidation
    After
    As of 1 May 2025, there were 18,291 public elementary schools, 215 fewer than the year before, and 8,982 public junior high schools, 51 fewer / In March 2025 MEXT issued a pamphlet based on its 2015 guidebook, which lists the use of closed school facilities among ways to handle common problems

    Why we got it wrong The FY2025 School Basic Survey release we cited has no comparison with 1989 and no figure of 7,647 or 21.7%; the year-on-year changes are in its Table 1, so we used those. The consolidation document is a pamphlet that says on its first page that it summarizes the points of MEXT's 2015 guidebook on the appropriate size and placement of public elementary and junior high schools. It says nothing about consultations with neighbouring municipalities.

  4. — Our use table claimed to break down schools, used category names that differ from the survey, and added groupings the survey does not have.

    Before
    The breakdown of 5,661 utilized schools by usage category / Transfer to other schools (consolidated/branch schools, private schools, universities, vocational schools, etc.) 4,191 / part of the continuing chain of school consolidation processes / intra-public conversion 2,899, private conversion 1,942; in suburbs, private conversion gains weight; in depopulated villages, intra-public conversion tends to predominate / Use Distribution by Location Type (suburban, mountainous, depopulated villages, tourist areas)
    After
    Uses are listed under the survey's own categories, such as schools excluding universities (4,191) and universities (81), with a note that counts are multiple responses tallied separately for school buildings and gymnasiums, totalling 10,348, more than the 5,661 schools in use

    Why we got it wrong Appendix 3 of the survey lists schools excluding universities as one category, with universities (81) as another. It gives no breakdown into merged or private schools and does not describe the category as part of consolidation. Because the survey counts uses, the table is not a breakdown of 5,661 schools. The intra-public and private grouping, the contrast between suburbs and villages, and the uses by location type had no support in the survey or elsewhere, so we removed them; the article itself called the location-type table a hypothesis.

  5. — We described the 1,238 schools with no remaining facility as demolished or scheduled for demolition, and left two gymnasium figures blank in the table of reasons.

    Before
    7,612 still standing (excluding 1,238 demolished or scheduled) / Poor location conditions and No funding available shown as a dash for indoor gymnasiums
    After
    7,612 closed schools whose buildings still stand (excluding 1,238 with no remaining facility) / For gymnasiums, funding cannot be secured 275 (13.8%) and poor location 299 (15.0%)

    Why we got it wrong In Appendix 3, 1,238 is the number of closed schools with no remaining facility. The 213 schools scheduled for demolition are counted within the 7,612 still standing. The table of reasons in the reference material also gives gymnasium figures (n=1,994).

  6. — We misdescribed two studies of closed school reuse and built a four-layer table found in neither.

    Before
    Funase et al. (2021), a peer-reviewed paper in CPIJ Kansai Branch Report Vol.19, with resident intention surveys identified as success factors / Ota, Lee, Komatsu (2024) on TSUKU-RASSERU (the reuse of former Asahi Junior High School), with interactions between user groups and operational groups generating diversification of activities / Four layers of governance, space, actors and time; introducing community participation after the utilization policy is determined yields a noticeable difference in operational continuity
    After
    Funase et al. (2021), a research report in the Proceedings of The City Planning Institute of Japan, Kansai Branch, and Ota et al. (2024), a paper in the Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), introduced only as far as their abstracts go

    Why we got it wrong According to J-STAGE, Funase et al. (2021) is a research report in branch proceedings, and its abstract does not mention resident intention surveys. The second author of Ota et al. (2024) is Yan Li. That paper's title and abstract concern TSUKU-RASSERU in Toyota City but do not name the former school, and we could not confirm that it was Asahi Junior High School. The four-layer table and the claim about the timing of participation appear in neither study, so we removed them. The section summary also named Kamiyama and Shiwa, which did not appear in the article.

  7. — What we wrote about small concessions and Park-PFI was not in the PDFs we cited.

    Before
    the Fukuchiyama model, a scheme with zero administrative burden and zero operating rights consideration (Small Concession Formation Promotion Project, 7 municipalities selected in FY2025) / the May 2025 revision of the Park-PFI Utilization Guidelines provides a reference framework for the integrated development of adjacent abandoned schools and urban parks built on former schoolyards / three walls of operator participation, renovation cost and operational continuity (5 years for designated management, 20 years for Small Concession)
    After
    The closed-school case from Komatsu in the May 2026 small concession guidebook, and the two school studies in the FY2026 formation project, checked against the guidebook PDF and MLIT's project page

    Why we got it wrong The MLIT PDF we cited for the formation project (001732321.pdf) is a document on proposed measures to promote small concessions; it mentions neither a Fukuchiyama model nor municipalities selected in FY2025. The Park-PFI Utilization Guidelines (revised 30 May 2025) say nothing about closed schools or schools. The three walls and the contract lengths we gave had no source either, so we removed them.

  8. — The Japan-US-UK comparison table and our statements about the number and location of closed schools had no source.

    Before
    In an international comparison, Japan occupies a middle position / US: municipal committees prioritize the highest bidder; UK: schools within 8 years of disposal require Secretary of State consent, with a statutory framework for discounted transfer to community organizations / Davis et al. (2023) contrasts the US highest-bidder-led model with Puerto Rico's grassroots community-led model / the property stock is among the largest in scale; located in regional centers
    After
    Davis et al. (2023) introduced for the figures in its abstract on closures and reuse in Puerto Rico and the challenges facing grassroots initiatives

    Why we got it wrong None of the references supports the comparison table or the idea that Japan sits in the middle. The abstract of Davis et al. (2023) deals with closures and reuse in Puerto Rico and draws no contrast with bidding in the US. We found nothing showing that closed schools are the largest stock among public assets or that they sit in regional centers, so we removed these statements.

  9. — We gave only the 20-year average of 442 and the figure of about 450 a year, without the recent year-by-year figures.

    Before
    An annual average of approximately 442 schools, roughly aligned with MEXT's statement of about 450 a year / The annual generation pace of 450 schools
    After
    The same annual average of approximately 442, followed by the survey's year-by-year figures: 279 to 405 a year since FY2016, never reaching 450, and 384, 345, 369, 358 and 298 for FY2019 through FY2023 / A pace of several hundred closures a year

    Why we got it wrong The figure of about 450 is the wording on MEXT's Minna no Haiko Project page. In Appendix 1 of MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, which lists closures of public schools by fiscal year, every year since FY2016 falls between 279 and 405, and FY2023 was 298. Years up to FY2015 ranged from 428 to 597. The twenty annual figures add up to 8,850, the survey's cumulative total. An average alone invites misreading the current annual number, so we added the year-by-year figures.

  10. — The next-steps table read as if property disposal always needs approval.

    Before
    A school built with national subsidy needs MEXT approval
    After
    Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)

    Why we got it wrong MEXT's page on property disposal says that using a building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period requires approval and repayment to the treasury, and that where certain requirements are met no repayment is needed and a report is enough. The table left out the cases where a report is enough.

  11. — The figures for the 5-14 age group come from two separate brackets in the source.

    Before
    The 5-14 age population is expected to fall by about 26 percent, from about 9.68 million in 2025 to about 7.19 million in 2050
    After
    In the result tables, adding the 5-9 and 10-14 five-year brackets gives 9.68 million in 2025 and 7.19 million in 2050

    Why we got it wrong The Institute's result tables (Table 1-9A, population by sex and five-year age group) have no 5-14 bracket; the figure is the sum of the 5-9 and 10-14 brackets. The wording now makes the addition visible. The figures themselves are unchanged. The URL has also moved to the result-tables PDF, because the combined edition returned 404.

  12. — The nationwide Park-PFI adoption count was out of date, and the figures for adoption and consideration had been swapped. We replaced them with the current primary source.

    Before
    165 parks nationwide had adopted Park-PFI as of March 2025, with 136 more under consideration
    After
    As of the end of FY2025 (31 March 2026), Park-PFI was in use at 203 sites, with a further 187 considering adoption

    Why we got it wrong MLIT's Park-PFI Implementation Status (as of 31 March 2026) states that Park-PFI was in use at 203 sites as of the end of FY2025, with 187 more considering adoption. The 165 we had been using as the adoption count was in fact the number under consideration at the end of FY2024. The same error ran through 45 articles on this site, so we checked and corrected them together.

  13. — The URL we described as our sister site was not ours.

    Before
    Sister site listed as https://machikarte.com
    After
    Machikarte, run by ISVD, at https://machikarte.isvd.or.jp

    Why we got it wrong Our Machikarte is at machikarte.isvd.or.jp. machikarte.com is an unrelated media site run by someone else. The description in the article was ours; only the URL was wrong, and readers who followed the link were sent to a third party.

  14. — We derived numbers of schools from shares of uses, but MEXT tabulates multiple responses, so that arithmetic does not hold. The derived figures (59.5%, 3,367 schools, 44.2%, 28.1%, 18.8%) have been removed.

    Before
    Pure conversion to non-school purposes accounts for 59.5% of the 5,661 utilized schools, or 3,367 schools; 44.2% of the 7,612 remaining buildings / intra-public 28.1%, private 18.8%
    After
    Counts are given as counts, with a note that multiple responses make it impossible to convert shares of uses into numbers of schools. Intra-public conversion 2,899 counts, private conversion 1,942 counts

    Why we got it wrong MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities marks the breakdown by use as multiple response. The counts total 10,348, above the 5,661 utilized schools, so 40.5% is 4,191 divided by 10,348 — a share of uses, not of schools. Subtracting from 100% to obtain a school count therefore does not hold. We also replaced the source for the breakdown, moving from a newspaper article to the MEXT survey itself.

Key Terms in This Article

Sounding (Market Survey)
A dialogue-based market survey conducted before public tender to gather private sector opinions and ideas on utilizing public assets. Used to pre-validate feasibility and appropriate conditions.
Small Concession
A small-scale PPP/PFI initiative (typically under 1 billion yen) for revitalizing underused public properties such as vacant houses and abandoned schools. MLIT established a dedicated platform in 2024.

What to check on your own case

  • In your municipality, in which years did the closed schools with no decided use close, and is the reason a lack of requests from the community or aged buildings?
  • Before deciding a use, did you survey or brief residents, and is the direction you agree with the community written loosely enough to leave room for operators' proposals?
  • For national subsidies used on the school building, have you checked the procedure for putting it to a non-school use?

YOUR PROJECT

From the general to your own case.

For your building and your tender terms, you can ask us about studies, policy groundwork, dialogue and proposal preparation. The first conversation covers where things stand and what we can cover; work on your case is quoted in advance.

Contents

Essential site functions are always enabled. You can change optional cookie preferences here at any time.

Learn more ↗

Search articles

Type what you want to find. Separate several words with spaces.

Search article titles, summaries and full text.

Primary sourcesGlossaryFAQ