Skip to main content
Public Asset Utilization Media

Site menu

PUBLIC AS A COMMON GOOD

Public asset utilization,
starting from the thinking.

Operated by the Institute for Social Vision Design (ISVD) ↗Sister media: KOSO 0 ↗Privacy Policy日本語で読む

ARTICLE · Abandoned School Reuse

Comparing Closed School Reuse by Use: Survey Counts, Contract Forms in the 47 Casebook Cases, and the Building Standards Act by Use

A side-by-side look at closed school uses: the counts by use in MEXT's survey (school buildings and gymnasiums, and differences from the previous survey), the contract forms (lease, transfer, conversion) by use across the 47 cases in MEXT's casebook, and which uses need change-of-use confirmation when converted from a school and which may be built in category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones, checked against the survey, the casebook and the Building Standards Act.

The points of this article

  • MEXT's survey (as of 1 May 2024) counts main uses separately for school buildings and gymnasiums, with multiple answers. Schools excluding universities are the largest at 4,191 (40.5%), and 1,538 of the 1,693 community sports facilities are gymnasiums. The previous survey covered schools closed in different years
  • Across the 47 casebook cases, 18 were converted by the municipality, 15 lent free, 8 leased for a fee and 5 transferred, among other forms. Of the 22 cases used as facilities of companies and other organizations, only one was a conversion, while every case marked as a community sports facility, certified centre for early childhood education and care or government office was a municipal conversion
  • Schools are in no group of similar uses under the Building Standards Act, so converting one into a child welfare facility or similar, a hotel or inn, a library, a restaurant and so on, with more than 200 m² used for that purpose, needs change-of-use confirmation. Offices and factories are not in Appended Table 1. In category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones, homes for the elderly, nurseries, welfare homes and libraries may be built, but offices, hotels and factories are not among the buildings allowed
Who this is for, and what to know first

Who this is for

  • Private operators, NPOs, and social welfare corporations considering entering abandoned school revitalization projects
  • Municipal education board and finance staff designing abandoned school procurement requirements
  • Regional revitalization coordinators and community organizations considering abandoned schools as tools for addressing local challenges

What to know first

  • [How to Reuse a Closed School](/en/abandoned-school-guide) for what to check in national documents first
  • Basic knowledge of national abandoned school case studies (optional)
In this article

Counts by Use in the MEXT Survey

Counts and shares by use, the school building and gymnasium split, previous survey counts, and cautions for reading them

Largest use: schools excluding universities

4,191

2,110 school buildings and 2,081 gymnasiums; 40.5% of uses (as of 1 May 2024)

Gymnasiums among the 1,693 community sports facilities

1,538

155 are school buildings

Casebook cases converted by the municipality, out of 47

18

15 free leases, 8 paid leases, 5 transfers, and 1 with a paid lease of the land and a free lease of the building

MEXT's survey counts the main uses of closed schools that are in use, separately for school buildings and gymnasiums. Multiple answers are allowed; the current survey counted schools closed from FY2004 to FY2023 and the previous one schools closed from FY2002 to FY2020. The counts and shares are as follows.

UseCurrent countShareSchool buildingsGymnasiumsPrevious countPrevious share
Schools (excluding universities)4,19140.5%2,1102,0813,94839.1%
Community sports facilities1,69316.4%1551,5381,75617.4%
Social education and cultural facilities1,20611.7%7504561,33013.2%
– Social education facilities8588.3%5143449899.8%
– Cultural facilities3483.4%2361123413.4%
Welfare and medical facilities7357.1%5332027747.7%
– Welfare facilities for the elderly1941.9%144502252.2%
– Welfare facilities for persons with disabilities1771.7%126511761.7%
– Childcare facilities680.7%4622670.7%
– Certified centres for early childhood education and care370.4%2314400.4%
– Child welfare facilities (excluding nurseries)720.7%5418660.7%
– After-school children's clubs1241.2%95291271.3%
– After-school children's classes340.3%2212390.4%
– Medical facilities290.3%236340.3%
Business and start-up support facilities1,20711.7%7894181,02010.1%
– Facilities of companies and other organizations1,13811.0%7413979479.4%
– Start-up support facilities690.7%4821730.7%
Government offices, etc.4494.3%3231264614.6%
Experience and exchange facilities, etc.5355.2%3491865205.1%
Emergency stockpile warehouses2312.2%158731992.0%
Universities810.8%4734790.8%
Housing200.2%137210.2%

Three things to keep in mind when reading this table.

  1. Counts are not numbers of schools. Because school buildings and gymnasiums are counted separately with multiple answers, one school can be counted under two or more uses
  2. Uses differ in how they use gymnasiums. Of the 1,693 community sports facilities, 1,538 are gymnasiums; schools excluding universities are split almost evenly between 2,110 school buildings and 2,081 gymnasiums; welfare and medical facilities are 533 school buildings and 202 gymnasiums
  3. Do not read differences from the previous survey as straight increases or decreases, because the years of closure counted differ. Business and start-up support facilities went from 1,020 to 1,207, but start-up support facilities within them went from 73 to 69, social education facilities from 989 to 858, and welfare and medical facilities from 774 to 735

The survey has no category for lodging and no breakdown by industry. Its categories do not match the industries operators think in.

The stock of closed schools: 8,850 cumulative, 7,612 still standing, 5,661 in use (74.4%), 1,951 unused of which 1,503 have no decided use.
The number needing attention is 1,503 — neither the 8,850 total nor the 1,951 unusedSource: MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)

Uses and Contract Forms in the 47 Casebook Cases

For each use the casebook assigns, the number of cases lent free, leased for a fee, transferred or converted

MEXT's casebook has 47 cases, and for each it gives the uses and, after the operator's name, the contract form (paid transfer, free transfer, paid lease, free lease or conversion). Across the 47 cases, 18 are conversions, 15 free leases, 8 paid leases, 3 paid transfers, 2 with a paid transfer of the land and a free transfer of the building, and 1 with a paid lease of the land and a free lease of the school building. Conversions include cases where the municipality uses the school as its own facility and entrusts operation to a designated manager or similar.

Counting the cases and contract forms for each use gives the table below. One case can carry several uses, so the case counts add up to more than 47. The count is this article's own, and each case number can be checked on its casebook page.

Use assigned in the casebookCasesContract formsCase numbers
Facilities of companies and other organizations22Free lease 11, paid lease 6, paid transfer 3, paid transfer of land and free transfer of building 1, conversion 11, 2, 6, 8, 9, 16, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 28, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 40, 43, 44, 45
Lodging facilities6Conversion 4, paid lease 1, free lease 120, 22, 30, 36, 41, 47
Social education facilities5Conversion 3, free lease 25, 10, 17, 45, 46
Experience and exchange facilities (nature experience facilities, etc.)5Conversion 3, free lease 25, 6, 18, 23, 39
Start-up support facilities4Conversion 2, free lease 217, 20, 31, 38
Community sports facilities4Conversion 420, 30, 38, 41
Cultural facilities3Conversion 2, free lease 15, 13, 21
Universities3Free lease 2, conversion 117, 18, 27
Certified centres for early childhood education and care2Conversion 224, 34
Welfare facilities for persons with disabilities2Free lease 1, paid transfer of land and free transfer of building 17, 15
After-school children's clubs2Conversion 1, paid lease 120, 42
Government offices, etc.2Conversion 229, 46
Welfare facilities for the elderly1Paid lease of land and free lease of school building3
Schools1Conversion4
Child welfare facilities1Conversion24
Medical facilities1Conversion46
Housing1Conversion46
Other11Conversion 9, paid lease 1, free lease 110, 11, 12, 14, 20, 22, 31, 38, 41, 46, 47

Of the 22 cases used as facilities of companies and other organizations, only Iizuna's Case 20 is a municipal conversion; the rest are leases or transfers to operators. Every case marked as a community sports facility, certified centre for early childhood education and care or government office is a municipal conversion. The case with the most uses is Iizuna's Case 20, with six (start-up support facility, lodging facility, community sports facility, after-school children's club, facility of companies and other organizations, and other).

The list of the 47 cases and cases by field are in the article 47 Former School Reuse Cases.

The Building Standards Act by Use

Uses that need change-of-use confirmation, groups of similar uses, uses allowed in category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones, and detailed articles by use

Uses That Need Change-of-Use Confirmation

When a building's use is changed so that it becomes a special building for a use in column (i) of Appended Table 1 and the floor area used for that purpose exceeds 200 m², the confirmation procedure applies, except for changes between similar uses specified by Cabinet Order. In column (i) of Appended Table 1, item (1) covers theatres, cinemas, performance halls, stadiums, public halls, assembly halls and similar; item (2) hospitals, clinics with inpatient facilities, hotels, inns, boarding houses, apartment buildings, dormitories and similar; item (3) schools, gymnasiums and similar; item (4) department stores, markets, exhibition halls, amusement facilities and similar; item (5) warehouses and similar; and item (6) car garages, car repair shops and similar. Uses similar to item (2) are child welfare facilities and similar; uses similar to item (3) are museums, art museums, libraries, bowling alleys, ski slopes, skating rinks, swimming pools and sports practice facilities; and uses similar to item (4) are public baths, machiai tea houses, traditional restaurants, restaurants and shops selling goods (excluding those with a floor area of 10 m² or less). The groups of similar uses that need no confirmation include theatres, cinemas and performance halls; public halls and assembly halls; clinics with inpatient facilities and child welfare facilities and similar; hotels and inns; boarding houses and dormitories; museums, art museums and libraries; and gymnasiums, bowling alleys, skating rinks, swimming pools, ski slopes, golf practice ranges and batting practice facilities. Schools are not in any group. For buildings in category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones and some other zones, certain groups are excluded from this treatment.

The table below summarises confirmation when converting a school into each use. Confirmation is needed when the floor area used for that purpose exceeds 200 m².

Use after conversionColumn (i) of Appended Table 1Change-of-use confirmation
Child welfare facilities and similar (welfare facilities for the elderly, support facilities for persons with disabilities, nurseries and so on)Similar to item (2)Needed
Hotels, innsItem (2)Needed
Gymnasiums, sports practice facilitiesItem (3), similar to item (3)Needed
Museums, art museums, librariesSimilar to item (3)Needed
Restaurants, shops selling goodsSimilar to item (4)Needed (for shops selling goods, excluding those of 10 m² or less)
WarehousesItem (5)Needed
OfficesNot listedNot needed
Factories (other than car repair shops)Not listedNot needed
Child welfare facilities and similar are child welfare facilities (other than centres for early childhood education and care of the integrated type), maternity homes, welfare facilities for the elderly, fee-based homes for the elderly, maternal and child health facilities, support facilities for persons with disabilities, community activity support centres, welfare homes, facilities for disability welfare service businesses (limited to daily life care, training for independent living, transition support for employment and continuous employment support) and others. Article 115-3 includes centres for early childhood education and care of the integrated type among the child welfare facilities and similar treated as similar to item (2). Even where no change-of-use confirmation is needed, major repairs or major remodelling of a building with two or more storeys or a total floor area over 200 m² need confirmation before work starts.

Uses Allowed in Category 1 Low-Rise Exclusive Residential Zones

When the use of a building is changed, Article 48(1) to (14) (restrictions in use districts and similar areas) apply mutatis mutandis. The buildings that may be built in category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones are houses; houses that double as offices, shops or similar and are specified by Cabinet Order; apartment buildings, dormitories and boarding houses; schools (other than universities, colleges of technology, specialized training colleges and miscellaneous schools), libraries and similar; shrines, temples, churches and similar; homes for the elderly, nurseries, welfare homes and similar; public baths (other than those for private-room bathing businesses); clinics; police boxes, public telephone booths and other buildings needed in the public interest specified by Cabinet Order; and buildings attached to these (other than those specified by Cabinet Order). In category 2 low-rise exclusive residential zones, shops, restaurants and similar specified by Cabinet Order may also be built if the floor area used for them is 150 m² or less (other than those using the third floor or above for that purpose).

In category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones, converting a school into a home for the elderly, a nursery, a welfare home, a library or similar falls within the buildings that may be built. Offices (other than houses that double as offices specified by Cabinet Order), hotels and inns, factories, and shops and restaurants are not on the list for this zone. However, the restriction does not apply where the designated administrative agency grants permission, finding that the building will not harm a good residential environment in the category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zone or that it is unavoidable in the public interest. Before granting such permission, the agency must in principle hold a public hearing to which interested parties are summoned and obtain the consent of the building review board.

Detailed Articles by Use

Programmes, statutes and casebook cases for each use are set out in the following articles.

A Guide to Repurposing Closed Schools for Welfare Operators: Leasing, Building Checks, Subsidies, Designation Standards and Cases [2026 Edition]

How to acquire a school and negotiate with the municipality, building surveys, subsidies and grants, and facility standards and cases by type of service

Closed Schools × Childcare (Nurseries & After-School): Floor-Area Standards, Grant Shares, and Cases from Mihara, Saikai and Yokkaichi

Facility standards and renovation for nurseries, conversion to after-school clubs, subsidies, and using the schoolyard and spare classrooms

After-School Day Services × Closed Schools: Fee Units, Facility and Staffing Standards, Designation Requirements and Building Checks [2026 Edition]

The fee structure after the FY2024 revision, facility standards and renovation, and the steps from forming a corporation to applying for designation

Closed Schools × Tourism & Lodging: Inn Permits, Zoning and Fire Rules, Farm-Stay Grants, and Six Cases from the MEXT Casebook

Inn business permits and structural standards, zoning and urbanization control areas, and fire code categories

Closed Schools × IT & Coworking: Ten Cases from the MEXT Casebook, Zoning and Urbanization Control Areas, Trial Satellite Offices and Grants

Survey counts, contract forms and renovation costs of ten casebook cases, the Building Standards Act and City Planning Act, and the trial satellite office guidelines

Policy

Abandoned School Use Change and the Building Standards Act — Renovation Requirements for Welfare Facility Conversion [2026 Edition]

The floor area that triggers confirmation for a change of use, and when fire compartments, smoke control and interior finish rules apply, checked against the statutes


What to do next

In the order you can act on them, within the week you read this.

#What to doWhereRough effort
1Find at least one occupant first. Decide who takes the space, then decide the useMarket sounding, local operators1–3 months
2Produce the seismic assessment and asbestos survey. Commission them if they do not existYour facilities team2–3 months
3Get a renovation cost estimate based on step 2, and price demolition alongside itA design officeOne month
4Check the property disposal procedure. Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)Board of education, MEXT1–2 months
5Hold a briefing with alumni and community groups before announcing the useAlumni association, neighbourhood associationOne month

Skip step 1 and you end up with a decided use and no one to take it.


References

Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2025)

Casebook on Repurposing Closed Schools (Minna no Haiko Project) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2023)

Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950) — e-Gov Legal Database (e-Gov)

Order for Enforcement of the Building Standards Act (Cabinet Order No. 338 of 1950) — e-Gov Legal Database (e-Gov)


Guide

How to Reuse a Closed School: Survey Counts, MEXT's List of Closed Schools Seeking Uses, the Property Disposal Procedure, and National Subsidies

Survey counts and why uses stay undecided, MEXT's list of closed schools seeking uses, when property disposal needs only a report or no treasury repayment, and the national subsidy list

Cases

47 Former School Reuse Cases — Success Patterns and Failure Factors from Ministry of Education Data [2026 Edition]

The list of the 47 casebook cases with their uses, and cases by field

Steps

How to Repurpose an Abandoned School — A Complete Step-by-Step Guide from Site Selection to Proposal [2026 Edition]

Seven steps: site survey, property disposal, change of use and building surveys, market sounding and proposals

Statistics cited in this article

  1. 1MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024) Open source
  2. 2MEXT, Casebook on Repurposing Closed Schools (Minna no Haiko Project) (March 2023), Cases 1–47(2023) Open source
  3. 3MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, Appendix 3, main uses (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  4. 4Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950), Articles 87(1) and 6(1)(i)(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  5. 5Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950), Appended Table 1(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  6. 6Order for Enforcement of the Building Standards Act (Cabinet Order No. 338 of 1950), Article 115-3(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  7. 7Order for Enforcement of the Building Standards Act (Cabinet Order No. 338 of 1950), Article 137-18(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  8. 8Order for Enforcement of the Building Standards Act (Cabinet Order No. 338 of 1950), Articles 19(1) and 115-3(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  9. 9Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950), Article 6(1)(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  10. 10Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950), Article 87(2)(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  11. 11Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950), Appended Table 2, items (i) and (ro)(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  12. 12Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950), Article 48(1) and (15)(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source

Share or cite this article

When quoting an article in internal reports, council proceedings, study sessions or research, include the article title, PUBLIC 0 (Institute for Social Vision Design) and its URL. Quotation and reuse guidance →

Corrections

  1. — A table and summary compared industry types by profitability, renovation cost, administrative scoring and subsidy access. None had support, and they have been removed.

    Before
    Industrial uses (factories, offices, data centers, etc.) offer the highest profitability / Welfare: profitability Medium (subsidy-dependent), renovation cost Medium (¥10–50M), admin scoring Very High, subsidy access Well-developed / Education: Low–Medium, renovation cost Low–Medium (¥5–30M) / Industry: High, renovation cost Low–Medium (¥5–20M), admin scoring Medium (needs strategy), subsidy access Limited / Tourism: Medium–High (per unit), renovation cost High (¥30M–150M) / Mixed: Medium–High, admin scoring Very High, subsidy access Well-developed / Proposals combining employment creation and community ties tend to outperform pure industrial use proposals
    After
    The survey's counts by use, contract forms by use across the 47 casebook cases, and change-of-use confirmation and uses allowed in category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones when converting a school, from the survey, the casebook and the Building Standards Act

    Why we got it wrong None of the profitability ranking, renovation cost ranges by type, levels of administrative scoring, subsidy access or the kinds of proposals that do well in reviews had a source. Renovation costs vary widely even within the same use among the 47 casebook cases. The article now compares things that can be checked: counts, contract forms and statutes.

  2. — The article said industrial use was increasing rapidly, that data centers and similar had emerged as new business types, and that classrooms were commonly converted into private offices. Neither the survey nor other material supports this, and it has been removed.

    Before
    A notable recent trend is the rapid increase in industrial use — IT company satellite offices, data centers, agricultural sixth-sector processing facilities, and food manufacturing plants have emerged as new business types / the following business types have emerged as new trends / Satellite offices and co-working spaces: Classrooms are commonly converted into private offices. Rental income and operational fees provide stable revenue / Data centers: Power costs are a challenge, but the model attracts attention for regional land use and employment
    After
    Business and start-up support facilities went from 1,020 in the previous survey to 1,207, but start-up support facilities went from 73 to 69, and the two surveys count schools closed in different years

    Why we got it wrong In Appendix 3 of MEXT's survey, business and start-up support facilities number 1,020 in the previous survey and 1,207 in the current one, but the previous survey counted schools closed in FY2002 to FY2020 and the current one schools closed in FY2004 to FY2023, so the difference cannot be read as a straight increase. The survey gives no breakdown by industry and has no category for data centers or food processing plants. There was also no source for classrooms commonly being converted into private offices or for rental income and fees providing stable revenue. The same wording was corrected in the latest trends article on 13 September 2026, but it remained in this article.

  3. — The descriptions of welfare, education and tourism contained unsupported assertions and subsidies that are not on the national list. These have been removed.

    Before
    A 'regional comprehensive welfare hub' model is also increasing / User co-payments are typically 1–3%, with stable public income providing revenue predictability / Available subsidies include MHLW's 'Regional Medical and Long-Term Care Integrated Support Fund,' prefectural welfare facility construction subsidies, and MEXT abandoned school utilization grants / Using rural abandoned schools as English villages or international education hubs / Educational uses tend to have lower profitability, but the social value of providing educational opportunities in the community is highly valued. Free schools in particular can access subsidies and free leases through collaboration with education authorities / Tourism uses command high per-unit revenue, but carry significant visitor acquisition risk and seasonal variation. Stable visitor flow is difficult to achieve without proximity to population centers or rich tourism resources / For rural and depopulating areas, securing initial visitor numbers is the greatest challenge / Meets inbound tourist demand for rural experiences
    After
    Programmes and subsidies for each use are set out, from the statutes and national documents, in the articles on each use (welfare facilities, nurseries and after-school clubs, after-school day services, lodging, offices), which this article links to

    Why we got it wrong There was no source for welfare hubs increasing, for the statement on co-payments and stable public income across all welfare services (this English version also gave co-payments as 1–3%, where the Japanese version said 10–30%), for free schools easily obtaining subsidies or free leases, for the social value of education being highly valued, for the English village examples, or for the per-unit revenue, visitor risks and location dependence of tourism. The Regional Medical and Long-Term Care Integrated Support Fund and MEXT abandoned school utilization grants do not appear on MEXT's list of national subsidies available for reusing closed school facilities.

  4. — The article said the mixed model was one of the most consistently successful approaches, that welfare plus café was the most widespread model, and that high-scoring proposals shared three elements. There was no source, and these have been removed.

    Before
    One of the most consistently successful abandoned school reuse approaches is the mixed model / Welfare + café (community café): The most widespread model, balancing stable public funding revenue with the café's community attraction / IT company satellite office + childcare support: Can also promote migration by families with children / Regardless of industry type, the highest-scoring proposals in administrative reviews share three elements: concrete local employment numbers, a clear response to a community challenge, and a community-open space that residents can use. Even industrial and tourism proposals score significantly higher when these three elements are present
    After
    The table of casebook uses lists the case numbers, and the article notes that Iizuna's Case 20 carries the most uses, six

    Why we got it wrong No material showed the number of success stories, how widespread a model is, effects on relocation, or that such elements raise review scores.

  5. — The article said community service types such as community sports, early childhood education and elderly facilities had historically been most common. For early childhood education and elderly facilities this does not match the survey counts, and it has been removed.

    Before
    Meanwhile, 'community service' business types — community sports, early childhood education, and elderly facilities — have historically been most common, reflecting municipalities' ongoing tendency to directly convert abandoned schools for welfare and educational purposes
    After
    Community sports facilities are the second largest use at 1,693 (16.4%), after schools excluding universities, while welfare facilities for the elderly number 194 (1.9%), childcare facilities 68 (0.7%) and certified centres for early childhood education and care 37 (0.4%)

    Why we got it wrong In Appendix 3 of MEXT's survey, community sports facilities come second only to schools excluding universities, but welfare facilities for the elderly, childcare facilities and certified centres for early childhood education and care each account for less than 2% of the total. The survey does not break down whether closed schools are used by municipalities or by private operators.

  6. — The next-steps table read as if property disposal always needs approval.

    Before
    A school built with national subsidy needs MEXT approval
    After
    Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)

    Why we got it wrong MEXT's page on property disposal says that using a building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period requires approval and repayment to the treasury, and that where certain requirements are met no repayment is needed and a report is enough. The table left out the cases where a report is enough.

  7. — The breakdown of uses did not match MEXT's survey.

    Before
    Community sports 14.2%, early childhood education 9.1%, elderly/disability facilities 8.3%, general business 7.8%, agricultural experience 4.1%, lodging 3.2%
    After
    Counting school buildings and gymnasiums separately with multiple answers (10,348 in total): schools excluding universities 4,191 (40.5%), community sports facilities 1,693 (16.4%), business and startup support facilities 1,207 (11.7%), community and cultural facilities 1,206 (11.7%), welfare and medical facilities 735 (7.1%)

    Why we got it wrong Opening the main-use table in MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, none of the six figures we published matched the survey, and the largest category (schools excluding universities, 40.5%) was missing. The tally counts school buildings and gymnasiums separately with multiple answers; it is not a breakdown by number of schools. The same point was corrected in other articles on this site on 29 August and 7 September 2026, but the change was never carried across to this one.

What to check on your own case

  • Which survey category does your planned use fall under? Will it use the school building, the gymnasium, or both?
  • In the casebook, are cases with that use mostly leased, transferred or converted? Which form will you choose?
  • Is the use after conversion a special building that needs change-of-use confirmation? May it be built in the use district where the school stands?

YOUR PROJECT

From the general to your own case.

For your building and your tender terms, you can ask us about studies, policy groundwork, dialogue and proposal preparation. The first conversation covers where things stand and what we can cover; work on your case is quoted in advance.

Contents

Essential site functions are always enabled. You can change optional cookie preferences here at any time.

Learn more ↗

Search articles

Type what you want to find. Separate several words with spaces.

Search article titles, summaries and full text.

Primary sourcesGlossaryFAQ