Skip to main content
Public Asset Utilization Media

Site menu

PUBLIC AS A COMMON GOOD

Public asset utilization,
starting from the thinking.

Operated by the Institute for Social Vision Design (ISVD) ↗Sister media: KOSO 0 ↗Privacy Policy日本語で読む

ARTICLE · Abandoned School Reuse

Latest Trends and Statistics in Abandoned School Revitalization【2026 Edition】

2026 Edition: The latest statistics from MEXT's survey, the uses whose counts changed since the previous survey, and national measures and subsidy programs. What municipalities and operators considering abandoned school projects should know as of 2026.

The points of this article

  • According to MEXT's abandoned school utilization survey (published March 2025), cumulative abandoned schools from FY2004 to FY2023 total 8,850. Of the 7,612 still standing, 5,661 (74.4%) are in use, almost the same as the 74.1% in the previous survey
  • Compared with the previous survey, use as business and start-up facilities rose from 1,020 to 1,207, while community sports facilities and social education and cultural facilities fell. The two surveys cover different ranges of closure years
  • The national PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan (2024 revision) lists Small Concession projects for idle facilities such as closed schools and the active use of private proposals among its measures. The article sorts the challenges into renovation funding, operator retention and municipal staffing
Who this is for, and what to know first

Who this is for

  • Municipal officials, researchers, and policymakers wanting to understand the current state of abandoned school revitalization
  • Private operators and NPOs considering the timing of entry into abandoned school revitalization projects
  • Beginners wanting a current overview of abandoned school revitalization

What to know first

  • No prerequisites (introductory article)
In this article

Latest Statistics Overview

8,850 abandoned schools and their utilization. The rate is almost unchanged from the previous survey, and 1,503 schools have no decided use

Cumulative school closures in Japan, FY2004–FY2023 (March 2025 survey)

8,850 schools

Closed school buildings currently unused (25.6% of remaining)

1,951 schools

School closures in FY2023 (latest)

298 closures

The five-year average is 351. No year since FY2016 has reached 450

Abandoned School Generation and Cumulative Count

Cumulative closures from FY2004 to FY2023 have reached 8,850. That averages 443 a year, but the spread between years is wide. In the same survey's year-by-year table, the peak year is FY2012 at 597 and the latest year, FY2023, is 298. No year since FY2016 has reached 450. The average over the last five years (FY2019–FY2023) is 351.

MEXT's own "Minna no Haiko" project page states that about 450 school facilities close every year. That does not match the ministry's own year-by-year data. When sizing a market, use the annual figures rather than the 450.

Of the 8,850 cumulative closures, 5,799 were elementary schools, 1,835 middle schools and 1,216 high schools and others. By prefecture, Hokkaido has the most, at 859.

The stock of closed schools: 8,850 cumulative, 7,612 still standing, 5,661 in use (74.4%), 1,951 unused of which 1,503 have no decided use.
Of the 1,951 unused schools, 1,503 have no decided useSource: MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)

Utilization Status

Of the 7,612 closed schools that still stand, 5,661 (74.4%) have been put to use and 1,951 (25.6%) remain unused.

The utilization rate in the previous survey (as of 1 May 2021) was 74.1%, almost the same as now. Of the unused schools, 1,503 (19.7%) have no decided use, up from 1,424 (19.2%). By year of closure, schools with no decided use number 89 for FY2021, 118 for FY2022 and 129 for FY2023, the highest of any year.

Distribution by Use Type

The survey sets out counts by use (multiple answers allowed) for the current and previous surveys. The eight largest are below.

Use (multiple answers)Current (as of 1 May 2024)Previous (as of 1 May 2021)
Schools (excluding universities)4,1913,948
Community sports facilities1,6931,756
Business and start-up facilities1,2071,020
Social education and cultural facilities1,2061,330
Welfare and medical facilities735774
Experience and exchange facilities535520
Government offices449461
Emergency stockpile warehouses231199

The previous survey counted schools closed in FY2002 to FY2020, and the current one schools closed in FY2004 to FY2023. Part of any difference comes from the change in which schools are counted.


How Uses and Policies Are Moving

Uses whose counts changed since the previous survey, and what can be confirmed about mixed uses, experience and exchange facilities, and Small Concession

Use as Business Facilities

As the table shows, business and start-up facilities rose from 1,020 to 1,207. Within that, facilities of companies and other organizations rose from 947 to 1,138, and start-up support facilities went from 73 to 69. The survey gives no breakdown by industry.

The contract forms and renovation costs of ten casebook cases with offices or coworking spaces are in Closed Schools × IT & Coworking.

Combining Uses

Counts by use allow multiple answers, so a school used for two purposes is counted under both. School buildings and gymnasiums are tallied separately: of the 1,693 community sports facilities, 1,538 are gymnasiums and 155 are school buildings.

Some projects put more than one business into a single building, such as welfare services alongside a café.

Experience and Exchange Facilities

Use as experience and exchange facilities stands at 535, almost the same as the previous 520 (see the table). MAFF's grant for rural revitalization (agri-tourism type), which can fund agri-tourism facilities, appears in MEXT's list of national subsidies available for reusing closed schools.

Receiving overseas visitors requires multilingual information and communications infrastructure as a baseline.

Small Concession

The PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan (2024 revision) uses for public-private projects with a budget under roughly ¥1 billion on nearby idle property, including unused facilities such as closed schools, and lists setting up a promotion council and supporting project formation among measures from FY2024. Of the seven local governments MLIT announced in April 2025 as recipients of expert support, Ikeda Town in Hokkaido (the former Takashima Elementary School and others) and Nagasu Town in Kumamoto (the former Nagasu Junior High School) are working on closed schools.

The Action Plan describes Small Concession as public-private operation "including concessions", so it is not limited to granting an operating right. Where a public facility operating right is granted, the right is deemed a real right and can be mortgaged (PFI Act, Articles 24 and 25).


Private proposals in the PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan, and MEXT's list of national subsidy programs

Private Proposals in the PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan

To encourage projects initiated by private operators, the Action Plan (2024 revision) says efforts toward effective private proposal systems need strengthening, and lists "active use of private proposals" as one of its measures.

National Subsidy Programs for Closed School Reuse

MEXT publishes a list of the main national subsidy programs available for reusing closed school facilities, organized by the new use. The main entries as of April 2026:

New useProgramResponsible body
Facilities for people with disabilitiesSubsidy for the Development of Social Welfare FacilitiesMHLW
Child welfare, childcare and after-school clubsNext-Generation Development Support Facility Grant, Early Childhood Education and Care Facility Grant, and othersChildren and Families Agency
Production, processing and experience facilities in converted school buildings in depopulated areasGrant for Sustainable Development of Depopulated Areas (redevelopment of idle facilities)MIC
Facilities for raising incomes and creating jobs in rural areasGrant for Rural Revitalization (agri-tourism type; settlement and exchange type)MAFF
Community and tourism exchange centersComprehensive Grant for Social Capital Development (urban renewal projects)MLIT
Community sports facilitiesSports promotion lottery grant (community sports facilities)Japan Sports Agency (Japan Sport Council)
Important Cultural Properties and registered tangible cultural propertiesRepair, disaster prevention and public use projects for Important Cultural Properties (buildings); repair of registered tangible cultural properties (buildings)Agency for Cultural Affairs
Local initiativesRegional Future Grant (regional future promotion type)Cabinet Office

These subsidy programs change in content and conditions each fiscal year. Current information must be confirmed with the relevant ministries and prefectural contacts.


Challenges and Solutions

The three challenges of renovation funding, operator retention, and administrative capacity, with response directions

Unit costs and amounts in financial examples without a cited source are illustrative assumptions, not statistically established market rates. Use estimates and comparable records appropriate to the target facility, location and business when preparing a project plan. Distinguish these assumptions from cited statistics and case expenditure.

Challenge 1: Difficulty Securing Renovation Funding

One of the heaviest burdens in reusing a closed school is securing renovation funding. Seismic reinforcement, barrier-free upgrades, and facility renewals for aging buildings often require tens of millions to over ¥100 million.

Options include combining multiple subsidies (layering national and prefectural programs) and crowdfunding from the local community. Where an operating right is granted, it can also be used as collateral for a bank loan (see Small Concession above).

Challenge 2: Operator Retention in Communities

After an abandoned school project gets established, operator withdrawal and closure can become a problem. Withdrawal before renovation costs are recovered is a significant loss for municipalities as well.

One option is for municipalities to build monitoring of operators' finances into the tender requirements, with a mechanism for finding a successor early if the business cannot continue. Another is running the project through a consortium so that it does not depend on a single company.

Challenge 3: Shortage of Municipal Staff

Promoting abandoned school revitalization requires staff with legal expertise (Subsidy Optimization Act, Local Government Act, building code compliance, etc.) and private-sector negotiation skills — but specialist talent is particularly lacking in smaller municipalities.

Options include prefectural support (specialist dispatch and training), MEXT's Minna no Haiko Project (which publicizes closed schools seeking new uses, among other things) and MLIT's expert dispatch for Small Concession.


Outlook to 2030

This article's own view, not statistics, of directions toward 2030

What follows is this article's own view, not statistics.

Shared templates for procedures: As cases accumulate, tender terms and contract templates get shared and procedures become lighter. Because the government lists Small Concession project formation among its measures, templates for that route may come first.

Use as business facilities: This use grew between the two surveys. Whether it grows again in the next survey is one thing to watch.

Private-sector-initiated proposals: Private operators identifying closed schools and proposing uses first may become more common. The PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan (2024 revision) also lists "active use of private proposals" as a measure (see Policy Trends above).

→ For an introductory guide to abandoned school revitalization, see How to Reuse a Closed School

→ For abandoned school subsidies, see Abandoned School Revitalization Subsidies and Support Programs

Guide

How to Reuse a Closed School: Survey Counts, MEXT's List of Closed Schools Seeking Uses, the Property Disposal Procedure, and National Subsidies

Survey counts and why uses stay undecided, MEXT's list of closed schools seeking uses, when property disposal needs only a report or no treasury repayment, and the national subsidy list

Six-Ministry Subsidy Guide for Closed School Reuse

MHLW welfare facility construction subsidies (national 1/2 + prefectural 1/4) and five other ministry programs — full coverage of available public funding.


What to do next

When developing a school reuse plan and renovation budget, check the following matters.

#What to check or considerResponsible team or contact
1Find operators interested in using the building. Ask about their intended uses and requirements, and use the responses to develop the reuse planMarket sounding and local operators
2Check the seismic assessment and asbestos survey results. If surveys have not been conducted, determine their scope and how to commission themFacilities team
3Estimate renovation costs from the survey results and compare them with demolition costsDesign office
4Check the property disposal procedures. For subsidized school buildings, check MEXT approval or reporting requirements against the intended use and disposal restriction periodBoard of education and MEXT
5Explain the proposed reuse to alumni and community groups and hear their views before announcing the useAlumni and neighbourhood associations

Check operator interest and requirements before finalizing the use, and take prospective demand into account when developing the reuse plan.


References

Survey on Abandoned School Utilization Status (March 2025) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2025)

About the Collection of Closed School Reuse Cases — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2024)

PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan (FY2024 Revision) — Cabinet Office, Private Finance Initiative Promotion Office (2024)

Main National Subsidy Programs Available for Reusing Closed School Facilities (as of April 2026) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2026)

Call for Experts to Support Local Governments Working on Small Concessions — Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2025)


Cases

47 Former School Reuse Cases

Success patterns and failure factors from MEXT data

Failures

Abandoned School Reuse Failures

Structural causes of withdrawal and business collapse

Statistics cited in this article

  1. 1MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024) Open source
  2. 2MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  3. 3MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024), annual closures at public schools(2025) Open source
  4. 4MEXT, Minna no Haiko Project(retrieved 10 September 2026) Open source
  5. 5MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024), Appendices 2 and 3(2025) Open source
  6. 6MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024), Appendix 3 and reference materials(2025) Open source
  7. 7MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024), Appendix 3, main uses(2025) Open source
  8. 8MEXT, Main National Subsidy Programs Available for Reusing Closed School Facilities (as of April 2026)(2026) Open source
  9. 9Cabinet Office, PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan (2024 revision)(2024) Open source
  10. 10MLIT press release, Call for Experts to Support Local Governments Working on Small Concessions(2025) Open source

Share or cite this article

When quoting an article in internal reports, council proceedings, study sessions or research, include the article title, PUBLIC 0 (Institute for Social Vision Design) and its URL.

What was corrected

  1. — The article said leasing a school as a satellite office means converting classrooms into private rooms and installing communications. This had no support and has been removed.

    Before
    Leasing a school as a satellite office means converting classrooms into private rooms and installing communications. Closed Schools × IT & Coworking covers how the numbers work
    After
    The contract forms and renovation costs of ten casebook cases with offices or coworking spaces are in Closed Schools × IT & Coworking

    Reason There was no source saying such works are needed. MEXT's casebook says the former Wada Elementary School in Suo-Oshima needed no major renovation to become a satellite office, because its classrooms are connected by a straight corridor. The unsourced income and cost figures have also been removed from the linked article.

  2. — The "four major trends", the claim that utilization rates were improving and several other statements had no support, and the leading use types and national subsidy programs were wrong. We rewrote them using the current and previous figures in MEXT's survey and the measures and subsidy programs in government documents.

    Before
    Utilization rates improving, with more decisions within three years of closure; community sports, early childhood and elderly care facilities leading by use, with a rapid increase in industrial uses; four major 2026 trends (industrial surge, mixed models, agri-tourism, Small Concession expansion); suburban consolidation increasing; subsidies listed as a MEXT program for closed school use, regional revitalization promotion grants, the Regional Medical and Long-Term Care Integrated Support Fund and METI programs; solutions described as spreading
    After
    Utilization rate 74.4% (previous survey 74.1%) and 1,503 schools with no decided use (previously 1,424); leading uses are schools other than universities (4,191), community sports facilities (1,693) and business and start-up facilities (1,207, previously 1,020); Small Concession and private proposals as described in the 2024 PPP/PFI Promotion Action Plan, and expert dispatch for closed schools from MLIT's press release; subsidies taken from MEXT's list as of April 2026; solutions described as options, and the 2030 outlook labelled as this article's own view

    Reason Appendix 3 of MEXT's FY2024 survey gives a utilization rate of 74.4%, against 74.1% in the previous survey, and neither Appendix 3 nor the reference materials count decisions made within three years. By use, schools other than universities are the largest category; childcare facilities (68) and elderly welfare facilities (194) are not among the leaders. Business and start-up facilities rose from 1,020 to 1,207, but the previous survey covered schools closed in FY2002 to FY2020 and the current one FY2004 to FY2023, so we note that too. We found no source for a breakdown into IT, data centers and food processing, for growth in mixed models or agri-tourism, for more suburban consolidation, or for wider use of Small Concession. None of the four subsidy programs we listed appear in MEXT's list of national subsidies for reusing closed schools, so we replaced them with programs from that list.

  3. — The next-steps table read as if property disposal always needs approval.

    Before
    A school built with national subsidy needs MEXT approval
    After
    Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)

    Reason MEXT's page on property disposal says that using a building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period requires approval and repayment to the treasury, and that where certain requirements are met no repayment is needed and a report is enough. The table left out the cases where a report is enough.

  4. — The article carried an unsourced forecast. It has been replaced with MEXT's own year-by-year figures.

    Before
    Approximately 400-500 abandoned schools are projected to continue emerging annually through around 2030 / Annual generation has declined from the peak of the 1990s to early 2000s (800-500 per year)
    After
    No year since FY2016 has reached 450. The latest year, FY2023, is 298, and the five-year average is 351

    Reason We could not trace the source of the 400-500 through 2030 forecast. The year-by-year table in MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities gives 384, 345, 369, 358 and 298 from FY2019 onward, already below 400. The 1990s peak figures cannot be checked either, since this survey starts at FY2004. We have also noted in the body that MEXT's project page says about 450 a year, which does not match the ministry's own annual data.

Key Terms in This Article

Small Concession
A small-scale PPP/PFI initiative (typically under 1 billion yen) for revitalizing underused public properties such as vacant houses and abandoned schools. MLIT established a dedicated platform in 2024.

What to check on your own case

  • Annual closures have stayed below 450 since FY2016, and the latest year, FY2023, is 298. At that pace, what approaches can your municipality or business take?
  • When leasing a closed school to a company, how can local employment, local procurement and community access be built into the tender terms and business plan so that both the municipality's evaluation and the business case hold up?
  • Where a public facility operating right is granted, the right is deemed a real right and can be mortgaged (PFI Act, Articles 24 and 25). If financial institutions come to value it as collateral, how would the barriers to private participation change?

YOUR PROJECT

From the general to your own case.

For your building and your tender terms, you can ask us about studies, policy groundwork, dialogue and proposal preparation. The first conversation covers where things stand and what we can cover; work on your case is quoted in advance.

Contents

Essential site functions are always enabled. You can change optional cookie preferences here at any time.

Learn more ↗

Search articles

Type what you want to find. Separate several words with spaces.

Search article titles, summaries and full text.

Primary sourcesGlossaryFAQ