Skip to main content
Public Asset Utilization Media

Site menu

PUBLIC AS A COMMON GOOD

Public asset utilization,
starting from the thinking.

Operated by the Institute for Social Vision Design (ISVD) ↗Sister media: KOSO 0 ↗Privacy Policy日本語で読む

ARTICLE · Abandoned School Reuse

How to Reuse a Closed School: Survey Counts, MEXT's List of Closed Schools Seeking Uses, the Property Disposal Procedure, and National Subsidies

What a municipality or operator should check in national documents before reusing a closed school: the counts in MEXT's survey and why uses stay undecided, MEXT's list of closed school facilities seeking new uses, the property disposal procedure under the notice of 31 March 2026 (when no procedure is needed, when a report is enough, and when no treasury repayment is due), the national subsidy list as of April 2026, and the contract forms in the 47 casebook cases, with links to articles by use.

The points of this article

  • In MEXT's survey (as of 1 May 2024), 8,850 schools closed between FY2004 and FY2023; 7,612 still have their buildings, and 5,661 (74.4%) of those are in use. For the 1,503 with no decided use, the most common reasons for school buildings were no requests from the community or others (41.5%) and an aged building (41.4%)
  • Using a school facility built with national subsidies for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs the approval of the Minister of Education. Under the notice of 31 March 2026, a disposal free of charge of buildings at least 10 years after the subsidized project was completed is deemed approved once a report is submitted, unless it leaves the school short of facilities, and no treasury repayment is needed
  • MEXT updates its list of closed school facilities seeking new uses every month. Its list of national subsidy programs for using closed school facilities (as of April 2026) covers programs of the Japan Sports Agency, the Agency for Cultural Affairs, the Children and Families Agency, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Forestry Agency, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, and the Cabinet Office
Who this is for, and what to know first

Who this is for

  • Municipal boards of education and asset management staff considering how to use a closed school
  • Private operators, NPOs and social welfare corporations that want to lease or acquire a closed school for a business
In this article

This guide sets out what to check in national documents before reusing a closed school. Start with MEXT's survey for the number of closed schools and why uses stay undecided, then open MEXT's list of closed school facilities seeking new uses, the property disposal notice, the national subsidy list and the casebook, in that order. The rules and statutes for each use are in the article for that use.

Closed School Counts and Why Uses Stay Undecided

The number of closed schools in the survey, the breakdown of those not in use, the main uses, why uses stay undecided, and whether residents were asked for their views

Schools closed between FY2004 and FY2023

8,850 schools

5,799 elementary schools, 1,835 junior high schools and 1,216 high schools and similar (as of 1 May 2024)

Schools in use among the 7,612 whose buildings still stand

5,661 schools

74.4%. The 1,951 not in use are 25.6%

Schools among the 1,951 not in use that have no decided use

1,503 schools

19.7% of those whose buildings still stand

MEXT's survey covers public elementary, junior high, compulsory education, high, secondary and special needs schools nationwide, and asks about the number of closed schools, how they are used, and the status of review toward use. Of the 8,850 schools closed between FY2004 and FY2023, 7,612 (86.0%) still have their buildings and 1,238 (14.0%) have no remaining facility. Of the 7,612, the 1,951 not in use divide into 235 (3.1%) whose use has been decided, 1,503 (19.7%) whose use has not, and 213 (2.8%) scheduled for demolition.

The stock of closed schools: 8,850 cumulative, 7,612 still standing, 5,661 in use (74.4%), 1,951 unused of which 1,503 have no decided use.
The number needing attention is 1,503 — neither the 8,850 total nor the 1,951 unusedSource: MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)

Main uses are counted with school buildings and gymnasiums tallied separately, as multiple responses. Schools (excluding universities) lead with 4,191 (40.5%), followed by social sports facilities at 1,693 (16.4%), corporate facilities and start-up support facilities at 1,207 (11.7%), social education and cultural facilities at 1,206 (11.7%), and welfare and medical facilities, etc. at 735 (7.1%). These are counts, not schools. The counts for every use and the comparison with the previous survey are in Comparing Closed School Reuse by Use.

MEXT states that approximately 450 closures per year occur nationwide. Its own survey, read year by year, shows 279 to 405 closures a year since FY2016, never reaching 450, with 298 in FY2023. By prefecture, Hokkaido has the most closed schools at 859, followed by Iwate at 331, Fukushima at 330 and Tokyo at 300.

The reasons uses are not decided are multiple responses. For school buildings (n=2,177), the most common are no requests from the community or others at 903 (41.5%) and an aged building at 902 (41.4%), followed by poor location at 387 (17.8%) and funding that cannot be secured at 327 (15.0%). Local residents had not been asked for their views for 3,580 school buildings (49.6%, n=7,211) and 3,850 gymnasiums (53.9%, n=7,144).

Trends

Closed School Reuse Trends in 2026: The MEXT Survey Breakdown, Why Uses Stay Undecided, Hearing from Residents, and National Programs

Survey counts beside the previous survey, tables of why uses stay undecided and of how residents were asked for their views, and ways to hear from residents


The List of Closed Schools Seeking New Uses

What MEXT's list contains, how often it is updated, whom to contact, and the forms a municipality uses to be listed

At the request of local governments, MEXT gathers information on unused closed school facilities for which each local government is seeking uses or users, and publishes it as a list. The list is updated monthly. The current version is based on information as of 1 September 2026, and it may include facilities whose call has ended or whose terms have changed. Questions about a listing and how to apply go directly to the facility contact at the local government.

The index lists each facility on one row, with prefecture, municipality, school and address, and some rows are marked "NEW!! 9/1" or "更新" (updated). Besides the index, the list is published as 12 regional PDF files, from Hokkaido to Kyushu 2 (Kagoshima).

A local government that wants a new listing, or needs to update an existing one, contacts the MEXT division in charge (施設助成課) following the administrative notice. Form 1 is the template for the list of closed school facilities seeking uses, and Form 2 is the application to remove a listing.

Policy

Is MEXT's 'Minna no Haiko Project' Actually Useful? — Turning Listed Closed Schools into Real Projects [2026 Edition]

How to read the list, how municipalities apply to be listed, how operators make contact, and how to use the reuse promotion events


The Property Disposal Procedure

Under the notice of 31 March 2026, disposals that need no procedure, disposals where a report is enough, disposals with no treasury repayment, and the repayment for all others

When a school facility built with subsidies such as the Public School Facility Development Subsidy is used for a non-school purpose within the restricted period, the local government that owns it must, under the act on the proper execution of budgets for subsidies (補助金等に係る予算の執行の適正化に関する法律), obtain the approval of the Minister of Education and repay the amount corresponding to the national subsidy to the treasury. MEXT has simplified the procedure, for example so that where certain requirements are met no repayment is needed and submitting a report completes it.

The requirements are set out in the notice of 31 March 2026. The treatments that matter for reusing a closed school are as follows.

DisposalProcedureTreasury repayment
Temporarily converting or lending a closed school facility or other subsidized property not used for school education, without altering it, for a use that serves the public interestNot a property disposal; no procedure is neededNot a property disposal
Disposing free of charge of buildings and similar at least 10 years after the subsidized project was completedDeemed approved once a report is submittedNot needed
Disposals listed in Appended Table 1 of the notice, such as converting the buildings of a school closed through a merger or a move to another site, where the merger or move received a national subsidy, into a public or government facility that is not for profit and makes no profit, and converting, or lending or transferring free of charge, buildings for use by special needs schools and similar schoolsDeemed approved once a report is submittedNot needed
Disposing for payment of buildings and similar at least 10 years after completion, and putting at least the subsidy amount that would otherwise be repaid into a fund for school facility developmentApply for approvalNot needed
Any other disposalApply for approvalIn principle, the subsidy share of the residual value of the part disposed of. For a lease for a fixed period, the subsidy share of the fall in residual value over that period. For a paid disposal at fair value, the subsidy share of the proceeds, capped at the subsidy share of the residual value

Even where a report is enough, approval is not deemed given if the disposal leaves the school short of facilities, or if the report lacks required items. The 10 years are counted from the completion of the subsidized project. Where a local government applies for certification of a regional revitalization plan and the Prime Minister certifies it, approval of the Minister of Education is deemed given under Article 18 of the Regional Revitalization Act (Act No. 24 of 2005) and the notice's procedure is not needed, including for buildings less than 10 years after completion. A municipality submits applications and reports through the prefectural board of education.

The notice asks the owner of the school, before a disposal, to confirm that it will not hinder school education, for example that school facilities will not fall short and that pupils' safety and the educational environment are fully considered, and to seek the understanding of local residents.

Besides the notice, MEXT's page posts an overview of the property disposal procedure for public school facility subsidies, a list of required documents (as of 31 March 2026), and a property disposal procedure handbook (March 2026).

Policy

Property Disposal of Closed Schools: When No Procedure Is Needed, Disposals Settled by Report, Treasury Payments and Funds, and Documents and Filing Times

When no procedure is needed, disposals settled by report and those needing approval, how the treasury payment is calculated and when a fund replaces it, and the documents and filing times

Steps

How to Repurpose an Abandoned School — A Complete Step-by-Step Guide from Site Selection to Proposal [2026 Edition]

Seven steps: site survey, property disposal, change of use and building surveys, market sounding and proposals

National Subsidy Programs

The conversion targets, programs and responsible agencies in the national subsidy list as of April 2026

MEXT lists the main national subsidy programs available for using closed school facilities by conversion target. The programs on the list as of April 2026 are as follows.

Conversion targetProgramResponsible agency
Community sports facilitiesSports promotion lottery grant (grants for community sports facility development)Japan Sports Agency
Buildings designated as national Important Cultural Properties or registered as national Tangible Cultural PropertiesRepair, disaster prevention, and public display and use projects for Important Cultural Properties (buildings); repair projects for Registered Tangible Cultural Properties (buildings); projects promoting renovation and development of cultural properties with added valueAgency for Cultural Affairs
Equipment for displaying, sorting and storing buried cultural propertiesProjects using distinctive local buried cultural properties (subsidy for preserving and using National Treasures and Important Cultural Properties)Agency for Cultural Affairs
Child welfare facilities and similar (excluding nurseries)Grant for Facilities Supporting the Next GenerationChildren and Families Agency
Nurseries and similar, small-scale childcare facilities and similarGrant for Early Childhood Education and Care Facilities; Subsidy for Comprehensive Childcare Support MeasuresChildren and Families Agency
After-school children's clubsAfter-School Children's Environment Development ProjectChildren and Families Agency
After-school places for childrenSubsidy for Comprehensive Childcare Support Measures (Emergency Measures for After-School Places)Children and Families Agency
Private certified centres for early childhood education and careGrant for Early Childhood Education and Care FacilitiesChildren and Families Agency
Facilities for persons with disabilities and similarSocial Welfare Facility Development SubsidyMinistry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Processing facilities, farming, forestry and fishing experience facilities, and local performing arts and culture experience facilities for inter-regional exchange and regional promotion (covering the cost of renovating idle closed school buildings in depopulated areas, carried out by depopulated municipalities and similar bodies)Grant for the Sustainable Development of Depopulated Areas (Idle Facility Redevelopment Project)Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
Facilities needed for efforts to raise incomes and create jobs in rural, mountain and fishing villagesRural Promotion Grant (Facility Development Project for Creating Value from Local Resources, farm-stay type); Rural Promotion Grant (same project, settlement and exchange type)Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Public facilities such as exchange facilitiesDevelopment of wooden public buildings within the forestry and wood industry circular growth measures (wood demand expansion and wood industry base strengthening); development of wooden public buildings within the comprehensive measures to strengthen the international competitiveness of forestry and the wood industry (strengthening the supply and use of construction timber)Forestry Agency
Facilities designated in a location normalization plan (medical, social welfare, educational and cultural, and child-rearing support facilities) and similarIntensive Support Program for Urban Structure ReorganizationMinistry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Facilities needed for community development, such as community exchange centres and tourism exchange centresComprehensive Grant for Social Infrastructure Development (Urban Renewal Development Plan Projects)Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Reuse of vacant houses by municipalities under a vacant house plan, for planned use that revitalizes the area (lodging, exchange, hands-on learning, creative activity and cultural facilities, and similar)Comprehensive Support Program for Vacant House Measures; Comprehensive Grant for Social Infrastructure Development (Vacant House Regeneration Promotion Project)Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Region-specific efforts based on local governments' own initiative and ingenuity, supported from planning through implementationRegional Future Grant (Regional Future Promotion type)Cabinet Office

The Minna no Haiko Project page notes that each program has requirements and that questions about details should go to the office in charge at the responsible agency. Subsidy shares, caps and eligible applicants are in the article below.

Guide

Subsidies for Closed School Reuse: All 6 Ministries Covered [2026 Edition]

Subsidy shares and eligible applicants, organized from MEXT's list as of April 2026 and each ministry's documents


The Casebook and Articles by Use

Contract forms in the 47 casebook cases, the confirmation needed when changing a school's use, and articles checked against statutes and national documents for each use

MEXT's casebook has 47 cases and gives the uses and contract form for each. Across the 47 cases, 18 are conversions, 15 free leases, 8 paid leases, 3 paid transfers, 2 with a paid transfer of the land and a free transfer of the building, and 1 with a paid lease of the land and a free lease of the school building.

When a building's use is changed so that it becomes a special building for a use in column (i) of Appended Table 1 and the floor area used for that purpose exceeds 200 m², the confirmation procedure applies. Child welfare facilities and similar are uses similar to item (2) in column (i) of Appended Table 1, and schools are not in any of the groups of similar uses that need no confirmation. Changing a school's use to child welfare facilities and similar therefore needs the confirmation procedure when the floor area used for that purpose exceeds 200 m². Other uses and use districts are set out from the statutes in the comparison article.

Cases

47 Former School Reuse Cases — Success Patterns and Failure Factors from Ministry of Education Data [2026 Edition]

The list of the 47 casebook cases with their uses, and cases by field

Compare

Comparing Closed School Reuse by Use: Survey Counts, Contract Forms in the 47 Casebook Cases, and the Building Standards Act by Use

Counts by use with the school building and gymnasium split, leases, transfers and conversions by use, and change-of-use confirmation and category 1 low-rise exclusive residential zones

A Guide to Repurposing Closed Schools for Welfare Operators: Leasing, Building Checks, Subsidies, Designation Standards and Cases [2026 Edition]

How to acquire a school and negotiate with the municipality, building surveys, subsidies and grants, and facility standards and cases by type of service

Closed Schools × Childcare (Nurseries & After-School): Floor-Area Standards, Grant Shares, and Cases from Mihara, Saikai and Yokkaichi

Facility standards and renovation for nurseries, conversion to after-school clubs, subsidies, and using the schoolyard and spare classrooms

After-School Day Services × Closed Schools: Fee Units, Facility and Staffing Standards, Designation Requirements and Building Checks [2026 Edition]

The fee structure after the FY2024 revision, facility standards and renovation, and the steps from forming a corporation to applying for designation

Closed Schools × Tourism & Lodging: Inn Permits, Zoning and Fire Rules, Farm-Stay Grants, and Six Cases from the MEXT Casebook

Inn business permits and structural standards, zoning and urbanization control areas, and fire code categories

Closed Schools × IT & Coworking: Ten Cases from the MEXT Casebook, Zoning and Urbanization Control Areas, Trial Satellite Offices and Grants

Survey counts, contract forms and renovation costs of ten casebook cases, the Building Standards Act and City Planning Act, and the trial satellite office guidelines

Policy

Abandoned School Use Change and the Building Standards Act — Renovation Requirements for Welfare Facility Conversion [2026 Edition]

The floor area that triggers confirmation for a change of use, and when fire compartments, smoke control and interior finish rules apply, checked against the statutes


ISVD offers free consultations for municipal staff working on closed school activation policies and operator selection. Inquiries from municipalities managing multiple closed schools are particularly welcome.

What to do next

For a municipality considering reuse, in the order you take them before setting a renovation budget.

#What to doWhereRough effort
1Find at least one occupant first. Decide who takes the space, then decide the useMarket sounding, local operators1–3 months
2Produce the seismic assessment and asbestos survey. Commission them if they do not existYour facilities team2–3 months
3Get a renovation cost estimate based on step 2, and price demolition alongside itA design officeOne month
4Check the property disposal procedure. Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)Board of education, MEXT1–2 months
5Hold a briefing with alumni and community groups before announcing the useAlumni association, neighbourhood associationOne month

Skip step 1 and you end up with a decided use and no one to take it.


References

Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2025)

Minna no Haiko Project (Everyone's Closed School Project) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Minna no Haiko Project: List of Closed School Facilities Currently Seeking New Uses — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

List of Closed School Facilities Currently Seeking New Uses (Index), 1 September 2026 edition — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2026)

Overview of Property Disposal Procedures Relating to Subsidies for Public School Facility Development — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Notice on Approval of Property Disposal Relating to Subsidies for Public School Facility Development (No. 1190, 31 March 2026) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2026)

Main National Subsidy Programs Available for Using Closed School Facilities (as of April 2026) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2026)

Casebook on Repurposing Closed Schools (Minna no Haiko Project) — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2023)

Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950) — e-Gov Legal Database (e-Gov)

Order for Enforcement of the Building Standards Act (Cabinet Order No. 338 of 1950) — e-Gov Legal Database (e-Gov)


Explore Further

Steps

Abandoned School Proposal Design — Selection Flow and Evaluation Criteria [2026 Edition]

How to choose an operator by proposal, and how to design the evaluation criteria

By Use

Abandoned School × Welfare Facility Revenue Model — Estimating Type B Employment Support Fees and Facility Costs [2026 Edition]

Base fee tiers, the special rule for newly designated facilities, and how to work out the facility cost difference, with cases

Failures

Abandoned School Reuse Failures — Why Repurposed Schools Become Idle Again: Structural Causes of Withdrawal and Business Collapse

Structural causes of withdrawal and business collapse

By Use

Closed Schools × Agriculture & Sixth-Sector Industrialization — Plant Factory, Processing, and Direct Sales Conversion Models

Plant factory, processing, and direct sales conversion models

Statistics cited in this article

  1. 1MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, Appendix 3, use of closed school facilities (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  2. 2MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  3. 3MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, Appendix 3, main uses (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  4. 4MEXT, Minna no Haiko Project Open source
  5. 5MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, Appendix 1, closures of public schools by fiscal year (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  6. 6MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, closures of public schools by prefecture (FY2004 to FY2023)(2025) Open source
  7. 7MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, reference material on reasons uses are not decided(2025) Open source
  8. 8MEXT, Results of the FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, reference material on hearing residents(2025) Open source
  9. 9MEXT, Minna no Haiko Project: List of Closed School Facilities Currently Seeking New Uses(2026) Open source
  10. 10MEXT, List of Closed School Facilities Currently Seeking New Uses (Index), 1 September 2026 edition(2026) Open source
  11. 11MEXT, Overview of Property Disposal Procedures Relating to Subsidies for Public School Facility Development Open source
  12. 12MEXT, Notice on Approval of Property Disposal Relating to Subsidies for Public School Facility Development, No. 1190, March 31, 2026(2026) Open source
  13. 13MEXT, Main National Subsidy Programs Available for Using Closed School Facilities (as of April 2026)(2026) Open source
  14. 14MEXT, Casebook on Repurposing Closed Schools (Minna no Haiko Project) (March 2023), Cases 1–47(2023) Open source
  15. 15Building Standards Act (Act No. 201 of 1950), Articles 87(1) and 6(1)(i)(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source
  16. 16Order for Enforcement of the Building Standards Act (Cabinet Order No. 338 of 1950), Articles 115-3 and 137-18(e-Gov Legal Database) Open source

Share or cite this article

When quoting an article in internal reports, council proceedings, study sessions or research, include the article title, PUBLIC 0 (Institute for Social Vision Design) and its URL. Quotation and reuse guidance →

Corrections

  1. — The title promised seven pitfalls municipalities stumble on, but the article did not list seven pitfalls. The welfare conversion cases and failure patterns in the description, and the project models said to have proven viable, were not in the article either.

    Before
    The Full Process from Assessment to Operator Agreement, and 7 Pitfalls Municipalities Stumble On / surfaces seven points where municipalities most often stumble / welfare conversion cases, and common failure patterns / the project models that have actually proven viable
    After
    How to Reuse a Closed School: Survey Counts, MEXT's List of Closed Schools Seeking Uses, the Property Disposal Procedure, and National Subsidies

    Why we got it wrong The article described five phases but never listed seven points where municipalities stumble. It had no concrete welfare conversion cases, no failure patterns, and no review of project models that proved viable. We replaced the content with what can be checked in MEXT's survey, notice and lists, and changed the title and description to match.

  2. — We wrote that, based on MEXT's survey data, closed school uses fall into five types, and described operating models and trends for each type. The survey has no such five types, and the trends had no source. We removed them.

    Before
    Based on Ministry of Education survey data, closed school activation falls into five broad categories / This type is directly tied to community cohesion and is frequently operated by municipalities themselves. Relatively low initial investment, and community consensus tends to be easier to build / Private-sector operators frequently manage these facilities, which can achieve self-sustaining operations through user fees / In recent years, satellite office use by urban-based companies seeking rural bases has drawn significant interest / offering stable, predictable demand / with an increasing number of cases demonstrating this / Activation types have diversified across social education, sports, industry, welfare, and migration promotion
    After
    Main uses are counted with school buildings and gymnasiums tallied separately, as multiple responses. Schools (excluding universities) lead with 4,191 (40.5%), followed by social sports facilities at 1,693 (16.4%), corporate facilities and start-up support facilities at 1,207 (11.7%), social education and cultural facilities at 1,206 (11.7%), and welfare and medical facilities, etc. at 735 (7.1%)

    Why we got it wrong MEXT's survey counts main uses in ten categories: schools (excluding universities), social sports facilities, social education and cultural facilities, welfare and medical facilities, corporate facilities and start-up support facilities, government offices, hands-on and exchange facilities, emergency stockpile warehouses, universities, and housing. It has no split into five types of social education, sports, industry, welfare and migration promotion, and the largest category, schools (excluding universities), was missing from the five types. The operating models, low initial investment and easier consensus, self-sustaining operation, stable demand, and growing interest or cases described for each type had no source.

  3. — We wrote that rural and mountain communities are disproportionately affected by closures, that demolition can cost tens of millions to hundreds of millions of yen, and that maintenance costs of unused buildings strain municipal finances. These had no source, and we removed them.

    Before
    Rural communities and mountain villages are disproportionately affected, and it is not uncommon for a single region to have multiple closed schools within its boundaries / Demolition alone can cost tens of millions to hundreds of millions of yen / closed schools already contain infrastructure that would require enormous investment to build from scratch / Maintenance costs of unused buildings strain municipal finances
    After
    By prefecture, Hokkaido has the most closed schools at 859, followed by Iwate at 331, Fukushima at 330 and Tokyo at 300

    Why we got it wrong In MEXT's survey, closures of public schools by prefecture (FY2004 to FY2023) put Tokyo fourth at 300, after Hokkaido at 859, Iwate at 331 and Fukushima at 330. The survey has no tally showing that closures concentrate in rural or mountain areas. The range of demolition costs, how well equipped closed schools are, and the effect of maintenance costs on municipal finances had no source.

  4. — In describing the process and operator selection, we wrote that market sounding usually hears that the economics do not work, that proposals are the standard method, that more municipalities leave rent out of the evaluation, and that follow-up support improves retention. These had no source, and we removed them.

    Before
    For closed schools, the most common concern is "the building is attractive, but the economics don't work." / A proposal-based approach is standard, with comprehensive evaluation covering business plan quality, community contribution, and operational structure / Continued regular check-ins and support after activation improves the long-term retention rate of operators / a critical factor in the eventual success of the activated facility / has become the standard method for operator selection in closed school activation / An increasing number of municipalities are excluding "price (lease amount)" from evaluation criteria or assigning it very low weight
    After
    The property disposal notice asks the owner of the school to confirm beforehand that school education will not be hindered, and to seek the understanding of local residents. In the survey, local residents had not been asked for their views for 49.6% of school buildings and 53.9% of gymnasiums

    Why we got it wrong We found no source for the concerns raised in market sounding, the share of operator selections that use proposals, the usual make-up of evaluation criteria, a growing number of municipalities lowering the weight of rent, or a link between follow-up support or workshops and operators staying. The account of the process now uses what can be checked in MEXT's notice and survey.

  5. — We listed 10-to-20-year agreements and other points as success factors shared by cases nationwide, and called the cases article 10 Closed School Cases. The success factors had no source, and the linked article covers 47 cases. We removed the factors and used the article's title.

    Before
    10-to-20-year agreements secure private capital investment / The diversity of business models continues to expand / 10 Closed School Cases (Rural, Regional, and Remote Island)
    After
    MEXT's casebook has 47 cases. Across them, 18 are conversions, 15 free leases, 8 paid leases, 3 paid transfers, 2 with a paid transfer of the land and a free transfer of the building, and 1 with a paid lease of the land and a free lease of the school building

    Why we got it wrong We found no source identifying resident engagement, local distinctiveness, municipal incentives and 10-to-20-year agreements as success factors shared by cases nationwide, nor for business models growing more diverse each year. The linked article is 47 Former School Reuse Cases, which covers the 47 cases in MEXT's casebook (March 2023).

  6. — We wrote that welfare conversion is one of the most promising categories with high demand and low competition, that communities with more elderly residents have the most closed schools, and that closed schools often meet welfare facility requirements. These had no source, and we removed them.

    Before
    has emerged as one of the most promising categories within closed school activation / An ironic correlation exists: communities with high proportions of elderly residents tend to have the most closed schools / Unlike food service and hospitality, these sectors are largely insulated from economic cycles / Wide corridors, multiple restrooms, and existing cooking facilities mean closed school buildings frequently meet the basic requirements for welfare facility construction standards. The cost advantage over new construction is substantial / Key to Success: Welfare Conversion is High-Demand, Low-Competition / This category consistently shows the best combination of demand predictability and activation feasibility / high demand and low competition / The growing case for converting closed schools to elder care, disability services, and childcare
    After
    Changing a school's use to child welfare facilities and similar needs the confirmation procedure when the floor area used for that purpose exceeds 200 m². In the survey's main uses, welfare and medical facilities, etc. count 735 (7.1%)

    Why we got it wrong We found no source for welfare conversion being among the most promising categories or having high demand and low competition, for a correlation between the share of elderly residents and the number of closed schools, for insulation from economic cycles, for how often closed schools meet welfare facility requirements, or for a cost advantage. Under the Building Standards Act, changing a school's use to child welfare facilities and similar needs the confirmation procedure when the floor area used for that purpose exceeds 200 m². In the survey's main uses, welfare and medical facilities, etc. went from 774 in the previous survey (as of 1 May 2021) to 735, but the two surveys count different closure years, so the figures show neither growth nor decline.

  7. — We listed a MEXT closed school subsidy, Japan Finance Corporation loans and regional revitalization tax incentives as available programs, and wrote that combining the Minna no Haiko Project with municipal subsidies is accelerating project formation. We removed programs that are not on MEXT's list of national subsidy programs or that we could not identify.

    Before
    Ministry of Education "Closed School Facility Utilization Promotion Subsidy" / Japan Finance Corporation regional revitalization loans / Regional revitalization-related tax incentives / Combining the Ministry of Education's 'Minna no Haiko Project' with municipal subsidies is accelerating project formation
    After
    A table of the conversion targets, programs and responsible agencies in MEXT's Main National Subsidy Programs Available for Using Closed School Facilities (as of April 2026)

    Why we got it wrong In MEXT's list (as of April 2026), the responsible agencies are the Japan Sports Agency, the Agency for Cultural Affairs, the Children and Families Agency, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Forestry Agency, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, and the Cabinet Office. No subsidy of MEXT's main ministry is on it. The Japan Finance Corporation loans and the tax incentives did not say which programs they meant, so we could not check them. We found no source showing that project formation is accelerating. The Grant for the Sustainable Development of Depopulated Areas (Idle Facility Redevelopment Project) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications is on the list and remains in the table.

  8. — We wrote that the pace of about 450 closures a year would not fundamentally decline while the birthrate stays low. MEXT's own survey, read year by year, has not reached 450 since FY2016.

    Before
    The rate of approximately 450 closures per year will not fundamentally decline as long as Japan's birthrate remains low
    After
    MEXT states that approximately 450 closures per year occur nationwide. MEXT's survey shows 279 to 405 closures a year since FY2016, never reaching 450, with 298 in FY2023

    Why we got it wrong The figure of about 450 is the wording on MEXT's Minna no Haiko Project page. In Appendix 1 of MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities, which lists closures of public schools by fiscal year, every year since FY2016 falls between 279 and 405, and FY2023 was 298. Years up to FY2015 ranged from 428 to 597. The twenty annual figures add up to 8,850, the survey's cumulative total. The annual number has already fallen, so we removed the claim that it will not decline.

  9. — The next-steps table read as if property disposal always needs approval.

    Before
    A school built with national subsidy needs MEXT approval
    After
    Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)

    Why we got it wrong MEXT's page on property disposal says that using a building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period requires approval and repayment to the treasury, and that where certain requirements are met no repayment is needed and a report is enough. The table left out the cases where a report is enough.

What to check on your own case

  • Which of the survey's reasons is closest to why the use of your closed school is undecided? Have local residents been asked for their views?
  • How many years have passed since the subsidized project for the building was completed? Will you dispose of it free of charge or for payment?
  • Which conversion target in the national subsidy list does your intended use fall under? Does the floor area used for it exceed 200 m²?

YOUR PROJECT

From the general to your own case.

For your building and your tender terms, you can ask us about studies, policy groundwork, dialogue and proposal preparation. The first conversation covers where things stand and what we can cover; work on your case is quoted in advance.

Contents

Essential site functions are always enabled. You can change optional cookie preferences here at any time.

Learn more ↗

Search articles

Type what you want to find. Separate several words with spaces.

Search article titles, summaries and full text.

Primary sourcesGlossaryFAQ