Skip to main content
Public Asset Utilization Media

Site menu

PUBLIC AS A COMMON GOOD

Public asset utilization,
starting from the thinking.

Operated by the Institute for Social Vision Design (ISVD) ↗Sister media: KOSO 0 ↗Privacy Policy日本語で読む

ARTICLE · Abandoned School Reuse

Abandoned Schools × Welfare Facilities in Kyushu — Nagasu Town and CTI Engineering's Initiatives

Analysis of cases converting abandoned schools to welfare facilities across the Kyushu region. Covers Nagasu Town's former junior high school Small Concession project, B&G Foundation's 'Children's Third Place' initiative, and Kyushu's abandoned school welfare conversion patterns. Explains why welfare facility conversions are chosen and the steps municipalities should take.

The points of this article

  • Nagasu Town is applying Small Concession methodology to the former Nagasu Junior High School site and was selected as one of seven municipalities in the FY2025 Formation Promotion Project
  • B&G Foundation opened a 'Children's Third Place' in Nagasu Town in April 2025 with a grant of 78.8 million yen, converting the former Community Welfare Center into a multigenerational hub
  • Nationally, welfare and medical uses of closed schools number 735 (FY2024 survey), below the 774 in the previous survey. Stable revenue, building compatibility, and supply shortages explain why the option is chosen
Who this is for, and what to know first

Who this is for

  • Planning and welfare departments in Kyushu municipalities considering welfare conversion of closed schools
  • Social welfare corporations and NPOs considering welfare operations (child, disability, elderly) in closed school facilities
  • Researchers and consultants studying abandoned school × welfare cases

What to know first

  • Basic abandoned school reuse steps ([Complete Guide to Abandoned School Reuse](/en/abandoned-school-how-to))
  • Abandoned school × welfare facility revenue model ([Abandoned School × Welfare Facility Revenue Model](/en/abandoned-school-welfare))
In this article

Current State of Abandoned Schools in Kyushu

School closure trends and reuse rates across seven Kyushu prefectures. Why welfare facility conversions are chosen

Nationwide school-to-welfare/medical facility conversions (FY2024 survey)

735 cases

Buildings and gymnasiums counted separately; 774 in the previous survey

B&G Foundation grant for Nagasu Town 'Children's Third Place'

¥78.8M

FY2025 Small Concession Formation Promotion selections (including Nagasu)

7 municipalities

School closures from FY2004 to FY2023, by prefecture: Kumamoto 282, Kagoshima 262, Oita 204, Fukuoka 191, Nagasaki 185, Miyazaki 101, and Saga 76. The seven prefectures add up to 1,301, or 14.7% of the national 8,850 (this article did the addition and the division).

Island areas and mountainous regions do move from multi-grade classes to consolidation, but no document shows how fast that happens region by region. Nationally, annual closures have run between 279 and 405 since FY2016, below earlier years (578 in FY2004).

The stock of closed schools: 8,850 cumulative, 7,612 still standing, 5,661 in use (74.4%), 1,951 unused of which 1,503 have no decided use.
Of the 1,951 unused schools, 1,503 have no decided useSource: MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)

Among the main uses of closed schools nationwide, counting school buildings and gymnasiums separately, welfare and medical facilities number 735 (7.1%), below the 774 in the previous survey (as of 1 May 2021). In Kyushu too, conversion cases span child welfare, disability welfare, and elderly welfare.

High Welfare Needs in Kyushu

Kyushu has comparatively high aging rates nationally, with elderly welfare service demand particularly strained in Kumamoto, Oita, and Kagoshima prefectures. Simultaneously, child poverty rates exceed the national average in several prefectures, making enhanced child welfare another priority. The combination of "high welfare needs" and "available closed school stock" is driving school-to-welfare conversions in Kyushu.


Nagasu Town's Small Concession

Former Nagasu Junior High School site reuse plan and basic plan formulation process

Former Nagasu Junior High School Site Reuse

Nagasu Town (Tamana County, Kumamoto Prefecture) is a town of approximately 15,000 residents. Facing the Ariake Sea, it is known for goldfish farming and shipbuilding. Selected as one of seven municipalities for the FY2025 Small Concession Formation Promotion Project, the former Nagasu Junior High School site is the target project.

Background of Site Reuse Following Consolidation

In April 2024, Nagasu Town consolidated its junior high schools, leaving the former Nagasu Junior High School buildings and grounds idle. The town promptly began studying site reuse after consolidation, initiating formulation of the "Nagasu Junior High School Site Reuse Basic Plan." By employing methodology, the town leverages national expert dispatch support while exploring utilization strategies that maximize private creativity.

CTI Engineering's Involvement

CTI Engineering is a comprehensive consultant with extensive experience in public facility management and PPP/PFI. Their involvement in supporting Nagasu Town's site reuse planning represents the expanding reach of Small Concession nationwide, with major consultants now supporting small municipalities in Kyushu.

Characteristics of the Nagasu Town Model

Nagasu Town's case is noteworthy for the following reasons:

  • Junior high school site reuse: While most closed school reuse involves elementary schools, junior high schools offer larger-scale gymnasiums, pools, and athletic fields, providing broader utilization options
  • Swift response after consolidation: Minimizing the time lag between consolidation and basic plan formulation to determine utilization policy before facility deterioration advances
  • Integrating welfare and regional revitalization: Combined with the "Children's Third Place" initiative described below, the town aims to form a community hub centered on welfare functions

Nagasu Town's "Children's Third Place"

B&G Foundation grant program. Converting former community welfare center into multigenerational hub

B&G Foundation's Grant Program

B&G Foundation (Blue Sea and Green Land Foundation) is developing "Children's Third Place" hubs nationwide. This program provides safe spaces for children from economically disadvantaged households — a "third place" beyond the home (first place) and school (second place).

The Nagasu Town "Children's Third Place" hub opened in April 2025, with a grant of 78.8 million yen. The former Nagasu Town Community Welfare Center was renovated into a multigenerational exchange hub — a welcoming space for everyone from children to the elderly.

Operating Structure of "Children's Third Place"

The Nagasu hub has the following operational characteristics:

  • Target users: Primarily elementary and middle school students from economically disadvantaged households, while also functioning as a multigenerational exchange space
  • Operating body: General Incorporated Association SEP manages operations, ensuring coordination with the local welfare network
  • Facility renovation: The former community welfare center was renovated with study support spaces, cooking spaces, and exchange spaces

Structural Analysis of School-to-Welfare Conversions

Reasons behind 735 welfare/medical conversions — stable revenue, building compatibility, supply shortages

Unit costs and amounts in financial examples without a cited source are illustrative assumptions, not statistically established market rates. Use estimates and comparable records appropriate to the target facility, location and business when preparing a project plan. Distinguish these assumptions from cited statistics and case expenditure.

Why Welfare Conversion Is Chosen

The FY2024 survey counts 735 welfare and medical uses (7.1%), a small share of the total. Three structural reasons explain why operators and municipalities choose welfare conversion anyway.

Reason 1: Stable welfare service revenue

Disability welfare and long-term care services have nationally regulated fee schedules, providing stable income with adequate utilization rates. Unlike tourism facilities or cafés, they are less subject to market risk, making business planning more predictable.

Reason 2: Physical compatibility with school buildings

School buildings are designed as "facilities where large numbers of people stay simultaneously," offering hallway widths, classroom sizes, and restroom counts that are compatible with welfare facility requirements. Employment continuation support type B, community life support, and after-school day services are particularly well-suited to classroom-sized activity spaces and gymnasium availability.

Reason 3: Nationwide welfare facility supply shortage

In many regions, the supply of disability welfare and child welfare facilities cannot keep pace with demand. Utilizing closed schools enables facility procurement at lower cost and shorter timelines than conventional new openings (property search → lease → interior renovation).

Welfare Conversion and Facility Costs

In the case collection, Nishiwaga Town in Iwate lends the school building free of charge and the land for a fee to the operating corporation, and Nagaoka City in Niigata transferred the building free of charge and the land for a fee. How far facility costs fall depends on your current rent and on what is agreed about land rent and maintenance.

→ For detailed revenue models of abandoned school × welfare facilities, see Abandoned School × Welfare Facility Revenue Model.


Kyushu Abandoned School × Welfare Patterns

Four patterns: child welfare, disability welfare, elderly welfare, multigenerational exchange

Organizing Kyushu region abandoned school × welfare cases reveals four classifiable patterns.

Pattern 1: Child Welfare

Converting closed schools to after-school day services, children's centers, and childcare support facilities. Nagasu Town's "Children's Third Place" falls within this pattern. These address community childcare support needs while functioning as multigenerational exchange hubs.

Pattern 2: Disability Welfare

Utilizing as disability welfare service offices including employment continuation support type B, community life support, and employment transition support. Classrooms are converted to workrooms and training rooms, with gymnasiums serving as recreation spaces. Kyushu's strong agricultural sector makes "agriculture × disability welfare" (agricultural welfare linkage) models particularly viable.

Pattern 3: Elderly Welfare

Utilizing as day services, community-based day care, and small-scale multifunctional in-home care facilities. With high aging rates, Kyushu — especially in mountainous areas — faces severe day service supply shortages, creating substantial demand for closed school conversion to elderly welfare facilities.

Pattern 4: Multigenerational Exchange

Rather than single-function welfare facilities, these serve as "multigenerational exchange hubs" where children, people with disabilities, and the elderly interact. The positioning of Nagasu Town's "Children's Third Place" as a multigenerational exchange space represents a pioneer case of this pattern.


Steps for Consideration

Five prerequisites municipalities should verify for welfare conversion

Five prerequisite steps for Kyushu municipalities considering welfare conversion of closed schools:

Step 1: Identify regional welfare needs

Review the municipality's disability welfare plan, long-term care insurance business plan, and child and childcare support plan to identify which welfare service types face supply shortages. Welfare conversion in areas without welfare needs is not viable.

Step 2: Assess building condition

Verify the closed school's construction year, seismic performance, and equipment condition. Pre-1981 construction requires seismic retrofitting, significantly increasing renovation costs. Also verify applicability of sprinkler requirements (welfare facilities exceeding 275m² gross floor area).

Step 3: Confirm use-change procedures

Verify Building Standards Act and Fire Service Act compliance for use-change from school to welfare facility. Additional smoke ventilation, emergency lighting, and evacuation route installation may be required.

Step 4: Recruit and select operators

Solicit utilization proposals from social welfare corporations, NPOs, and private operators. Posting on MEXT's "Everyone's Closed School Project" enables outreach to operators nationwide.

Step 5: Prepare for NIMBY issues

Proactively assess the risk of neighborhood opposition (NIMBY) to welfare facilities (particularly disability facilities) and design resident information sessions and consultation processes.

→ For abandoned school reuse prerequisite checklists, see 47 Abandoned School Reuse Cases.


Abandoned School × Welfare Facility Revenue Model

Using Type B continuous employment support as the example: base fee tiers from June 2026, the rule on user wages, how to work out facility cost differences, and three cases.

7 Small Concession Cases

Target facilities, experts, and design intent of 7 municipalities selected in FY2026

What to do next

When developing a school reuse plan and renovation budget, check the following matters.

#What to check or considerResponsible team or contact
1Find operators interested in using the building. Ask about their intended uses and requirements, and use the responses to develop the reuse planMarket sounding and local operators
2Check the seismic assessment and asbestos survey results. If surveys have not been conducted, determine their scope and how to commission themFacilities team
3Estimate renovation costs from the survey results and compare them with demolition costsDesign office
4Check the property disposal procedures. For subsidized school buildings, check MEXT approval or reporting requirements against the intended use and disposal restriction periodBoard of education and MEXT
5Explain the proposed reuse to alumni and community groups and hear their views before announcing the useAlumni and neighbourhood associations

Check operator interest and requirements before finalizing the use, and take prospective demand into account when developing the reuse plan.


References

FY2024 Survey on Utilization of Closed School Facilities in Public Elementary and Middle Schools — Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (2025)

Announcement of Expert Recruitment for Small Concession Municipalities — Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2026)

Nagasu Town Children's Third Place Hub Opens — Blue Sea and Green Land Foundation (B&G Foundation) (2025)

'Children's Third Place' to Open in Nagasu Town for Elementary and Middle School Students from Economically Disadvantaged Families, Spring 2025 — Nishinippon Shimbun (2024)


Cases

47 Former School Reuse Cases

Success patterns and failure factors from MEXT data

Guide

How to Reuse a Closed School: Survey Counts, MEXT's List of Closed Schools Seeking Uses, the Property Disposal Procedure, and National Subsidies

Survey counts and why uses stay undecided, MEXT's list of closed schools seeking uses, when property disposal needs only a report or no treasury repayment, and the national subsidy list

Regional

Abandoned School Reuse in Tohoku

Challenges and success stories from aging regions

Statistics cited in this article

  1. 1MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024), main uses(2025) Open source
  2. 2Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun(2024) Open source
  3. 3MLIT Small Concession Formation Promotion Project(2025) Open source
  4. 4MEXT, FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024)(2025) Open source
  5. 5B&G Foundation(2025) Open source
  6. 6MEXT, Closed School Reuse Case Collection (March 2023)(2023) Open source

Share or cite this article

When quoting an article in internal reports, council proceedings, study sessions or research, include the article title, PUBLIC 0 (Institute for Social Vision Design) and its URL.

What was corrected

  1. — Replaced the claim of accelerating consolidation in Kyushu's islands and mountains with the survey's prefecture figures.

    Before
    Island areas (Nagasaki, Kagoshima prefectures) and mountainous regions (Kumamoto, Oita prefectures) in particular face accelerating processes of multi-grade classes to consolidation to closure.
    After
    School closures from FY2004 to FY2023, by prefecture: Kumamoto 282, Kagoshima 262, Oita 204, Fukuoka 191, Nagasaki 185, Miyazaki 101, and Saga 76

    Reason MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities (as of 1 May 2024) gives closures by prefecture. No document shows how fast the process runs region by region.

  2. — We described conversion of closed schools to welfare facilities as an increasing trend. MEXT's survey counts 735 welfare and medical uses against 774 in the previous survey, so it was not increasing.

    Before
    735 have been converted to welfare or medical facilities, showing an increasing trend in recent years. This upward trend is also evident in the Kyushu region / Heading: Why Welfare Conversions Are Increasing
    After
    Welfare and medical facilities number 735 (7.1%) among main uses counted with multiple answers, below the 774 in the previous survey / Heading: Why Welfare Conversion Is Chosen

    Reason The main-uses table of MEXT's FY2024 Survey on the Utilization of Closed School Facilities counts school buildings and gymnasiums separately, with multiple answers. Welfare and medical facilities number 735, and the previous survey (as of 1 May 2021), shown for reference, records 774. Disability welfare facilities are 177 and 176. The two surveys cover different ranges of fiscal years (FY2002 to FY2020 last time, FY2004 to FY2023 this time), so a simple change cannot be stated, but the figures cannot be read as growth. We had also cited nothing showing growth in Kyushu. The 735 is a count of uses, not a number of schools out of the 8,850 total, so we corrected that wording too. The three structural reasons remain as reasons welfare conversion is chosen.

  3. — The next-steps table read as if property disposal always needs approval.

    Before
    A school built with national subsidy needs MEXT approval
    After
    Using a subsidized school building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period needs MEXT approval (a report is enough where the requirements are met)

    Reason MEXT's page on property disposal says that using a building for a non-school purpose within the restricted period requires approval and repayment to the treasury, and that where certain requirements are met no repayment is needed and a report is enough. The table left out the cases where a report is enough.

  4. — We presented the saving on facility costs from using a closed school as if it were a published figure.

    Before
    Typical leased properties cost 200,000-400,000 yen monthly in facility rent, but free or low-cost provision of closed schools reduces this to 0-50,000 yen monthly, achieving cost savings of 150,000-350,000 yen per month / heading Revenue Advantage of Welfare Conversion / related article card: Structure for reducing facility costs by ¥150,000-350,000/month
    After
    In the case collection, Nishiwaga lends the school building free and the land for a fee, and Nagaoka transferred the building free and the land for a fee. How far facility costs fall depends on current rent and on what is agreed about land rent and maintenance / heading Welfare Conversion and Facility Costs / the card now describes the revenue model article as it stands

    Reason The rents of 200,000-400,000 yen and closed school facility costs of 0-50,000 yen were assumptions made in the revenue model article, not published figures. That article was rewritten the same day to show how to work out the facility cost difference and how the building and land were handled in the cases.

Key Terms in This Article

Small Concession
A small-scale PPP/PFI initiative (typically under 1 billion yen) for revitalizing underused public properties such as vacant houses and abandoned schools. MLIT established a dedicated platform in 2024.

What to check on your own case

  • Can the closed school under consideration accommodate the Building Standards Act use-change requirements for welfare facilities?
  • Among regional welfare needs (child, disability, elderly), which service type has the greatest supply shortage?
  • How do you assess and plan for NIMBY risk (neighborhood opposition) to welfare facilities?

YOUR PROJECT

From the general to your own case.

For your building and your tender terms, you can ask us about studies, policy groundwork, dialogue and proposal preparation. The first conversation covers where things stand and what we can cover; work on your case is quoted in advance.

Contents

Essential site functions are always enabled. You can change optional cookie preferences here at any time.

Learn more ↗

Search articles

Type what you want to find. Separate several words with spaces.

Search article titles, summaries and full text.

Primary sourcesGlossaryFAQ